The Globe Weekly News     WORLD OF ENTERTAINMENT, TV & CINEMA THIS YEAR    International Edition

référencement  référencement  référencement  référencement  référencementréférencement  référencement  référencement  référencement  référencement

Front Page I  Political & Social Analyses I Breaking News: USA, World, Europe, Middle East I PoliticsLast Minute International News I Issues of the Hour I Entertainment Cinema I World of Cinema & Entertainment this Year I Music: CDs I World of Music this Year I ArtsTelevision I People I People with an Attitude I Society Lifestyle Culture I Books Travel I Commentaries I Articles Gossips Personal HistoryNewsmakers Consumers I Work I Business Family I Parenting I Health I Around the world I Woman's world I Beauty I Fashion I Style I The Grapevine I Opinions I Viewpoints I Stars. Celebrities I Spotlight I Unusual & Strange World I Studies: Islam I History. Civilization: Iraq I Societies. Social Systems I In-Depth Articles I Contact I Liens inclus I Liens de valeur I

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

WORLD OF ENTERTAINMENT TV AND CINEMA THIS YEAR

By Maximillien de Lafayette Continues on Next Page

PART ONE: Part 1

1-A GLANCE AT THE MOVIES OF THE YEAR                                                 2-THE FULL LENGTH ANIMATED        3-MOVIE REVIVAL OF DYING GENRES 4-FILM TOP 10 AND TURKEY OF THE YEAR                                                 5-COMEDY OF THE YEAR                   6-THE MOST TALKED TV FILM PROGRAMS                                       7-COMEDY TOP 10  AND TURKEY OF THE YEAR                                          8-TELEVISION FILMS OF THE YEAR  9-DOCUMENTARIES BEAT DRAMA IN THE RATING                                    10-TV Top 10  MOVIE SHOWS          11-Favorite Winners and Turkeys of the Year. What Peers and Critics Think?                                             12-REVIEWS OF MAJOR RELEASES OF THE YEAR                                   13-BETWEEN FICTION, NONFICTION AND POLITICS                                 14-THE WORST AND GROSSEST FILMS OF THE YEAR                        15-SECOND RATE MOVIES OF THE YEAR                                                16-FILMS OF SUBSTANCE OF THE YEAR

PART TWO: Part 2

1-THE BOX OFFICE TOP FILMS         2-BOX OFFICE TOP RECORDS

PART THREE Part 3

1-CINEMA HEADLINERS OF THE YEARSpider-Man 2 - definetly not made in Britain

PART FOUR : CANNES FILM FESTIVAL Part 4

1-WORLD'S MAJOR FILM FESTIVALS 2-Feature Films In Competition         3-Feature Films Out of Competition  4-Short Films                                     5-Caméra d'Or                                   6-Un Certain Regard                         7-Cinéfondati                                    8-The Winners                                   9-Top prize reflects clash of French vs. foreign sensibilities                    10-HIERARCHY AMONG RED-CARPET GUESTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                         11-IN GENERAL, FILMS WITH COMIC ELEMENTS DO NOT WIN PRIZES                                                                                                                         12-THE GLAMOUR AND STARS OF CANNES                                                                                                                                                                   13- CANNES JURY                                                                                                                                                                                                          14-CANNES HEADACHES AND CONTROVERSIES                                                                                                                                                           15-POLITICS AT CANNES FESTIVAL                                                                                                                                                                              16-MADE IN BRITAIN FOR CANNES

 

PART FIVE  Part 5

1-GOLDEN GLOBES                          2-RETURN OF THE KING WINS BEST PICTURE                                          3-MURRAY DRYLY MOCKS HOLLYWOOD AWARD SPEECHES    4-MERYL STREEP AND AL PACINO GET BEST TV MOVIE LEAD PERFORMERS HONORS

PART SIX: THE GOLDEN GLOBES & THE OSCARS Part 6

1-MICHAEL DOUGLAS RECEIVES THE HONORARY CECIL B. DeVille AWARD                                             2-Stars Play it Safe With Blooming Spring Colors                                   3-Mystic River, Cold Mountain, Lost In Translation among top nominees                                                                                                                         4-FIVE NOMINATIONS WENT TO MYSTIC RIVER                                                                                                                                                              5-THE BARBARIAN INVASIONS LOST TO AFGHANISTAN'S FILM "OSAMA"                                                                                                                      6-LORENZO SORIA, PRESIDENT OF THE HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION: "CANADIANS AND AUSTRALIANS CONTRIBUTED GREATLY TO FILM AND TELEVISION"                                                                                                                                                                                              7-GOSSIPS, SURPRISES AND DRAMA                                                                                                                                                                             8-"IT COULD BE A MONTY PYTHON SKETCH"                                                                                                                                                                  9-THE NOMINATIONS, NOMINEES AND EXPECTATIONS                                                                                                                                                 10-THE NOMINEES LIST                                                                                                                                                                                                 11-NOMINATED FILMS                                                                                                                                                                                                    12-FULL LIST OF WINNERS 12-THE HOTTEST GOSSIPS AT THE OSCARS                                                                                                                      13-OSCAR FOLKS GO HUSH-HUSH ABOUT GIFT BAGS

PART SEVEN  Part 7

1-SAGS 2-THERON AND DEPP TAKE THE SCREEN ACTOR GUILD AWARDS 3-TIM ROBBINS WON SUPPORTING ACTOR AWARD 4-ZELLWEGER WON THE LEAD ACTRESS AWARD 5-GUILD'S TV AWARDS 6-INSIDE THE SAGS

PART EIGHT  Part 8

1-TELEVISION: EMMY AWARD                                                                                                                                                                                         2-Ellen DeGeneres captures the Daytime Emmy for talk show                                                                                                                                        3-BRADY: BEST TALK SHOW HOST

PART NINE: BRITAIN'S SOAP OPERA AWARDS Part 9

PART TEN: CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES AND HEATED DEBATES  OF THE YEAR Part 10

PART ELEVEN: THE MOTION PICTURES GRAPEVINE Part 11

PART TWELVE: BOX OFFICE TOP EARNINGS Part 12

PART THIRTEEN: HOT TALKS OF THE YEAR Part 13

PART FOURTEEN

1-THE INDIVIDUAL WORKS 2-Roman Polanski: Film's dark prince  Part 14

3-GODDARD: THE SUBLIME KINETIC EXPERIENCE  Part 14

PART FIFTEEN: THE HOLLYWOOD FILE: THE MEGA DOLLAR WOMEN. THE MOST EXPENSIVE STARS IN HOLLYWOOD Part 15

 

 

 

REVIEWS AND RATING

PART ONE: A GLANCE AT THE MOVIES OF THE YEAR

NOT A GOOD YEAR FOR ESTABLISHED  FILM DIRECTORS. This was not a good year for established directors. Steven Spielberg's comedy Catch Me If You Can was lightweight and forgettable. Martin Scorsese's Gangs of New York was intermittently impressive but did not live up to the immense expectations it created. James Ivory's The Divorce was a tired exercise. Brian De Palma's erotic thriller Femme Fatale was enjoyable in a mindless way but suffered the fate of going straight to video. Ang Lee's Hulk, Alan Parker's Life of David Gale and Lawrence Kasdan's Dreamcatcher bordered on the disastrous. The sad thing about the British cinema was the absence of movies by Mike Leigh, Ken Loach and Christopher Nolan in what was a pretty dire year with endless mirthless comedies and dull thrillers. Stephen Fry's debut, Bright Young Things, a version of Evelyn Waugh's Vile Bodies, attracted a lot of attention but generally misfired. Thaddeus O'Sullivan's The Heart of Me, an adaptation of another novel about the Thirties, Rosamond Lehmann's The Echoing Grove, was better, but went largely unnoticed. The biggest British box-office success, Richard Curtis's Love, Actually, was a shamelessly calculating affair, slightly redeemed by the performances of Bill Nighy and Emma Thompson. Calendar Girls was liked by some, and The Mother was admired largely for the courageous performance of the 68-year-old Anne Reid as a widow having an affair with a much younger man. The two real triumphs of the British cinema were both harsh, unsentimental docu-dramas set abroad: In This World, Michael Winterbottom's account of two Afghan teenagers making an illegal journey to Britain from a Pakistan refugee camp, and Kevin Macdonald's mountaineering movie Touching the Void. What we lacked were Blair-era equivalents of Thatcher Britain pictures of the Eighties and early Nineties, pictures like The Ploughman's Lunch and Raining Stones. The nearest thing to this, and the year's sharpest, most imaginative film about politics and social change, was Goodbye Lenin!, Wolfgang Becker's satire on German unification. As always, there were too many unnecessary remakes, the worst being Jonathan Demme's The Truth About Charlie, a disastrous reworking of Charade, with Mark Wahlberg trying to walk in Cary Grant's old shoes. There will be worse to come next year with Demme remaking The Manchurian Candidate (that's like Rolf Harris repainting the Sistine Chapel), the Coen brothers's Americanisation of The Ladykillers and Tom Hanks planning a new version of Kurosawa's Ikuru . Fortunately there were useful re-releases that should deter remakers, most prominently The Leopard, Sunset Boulevard, Alien and Nicholas Ray's Bigger Than Life. On a more positive note, some new directors emerged and several young ones confirmed their promise. Spike Jonze surpassed himself with Adaptation. Lilya 4-Ever, the third film of the Swedish director Lukas Moodysson, was a fine work marred by sentimentality. Dylan Kidd made a striking debut with the American independent production Roger Dodger, as did the Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles with his devastating look at gang warfare in the slums of Rio, City of God. After an unimpressive low-budget debut with the curious road movie The Last Great Wilderness, the Scottish moviemaker David Mackenzie made a quantum leap with his second film, Young Adam , a sombre adaptation of Alexander Trocchi's bleak Clydeside thriller, in which the ubiquitous Ewan McGregor gives his best performance to date. Charlotte Rampling (The Swimming Pool), Cate Blanchett (Veronica Guerin) and Max von Sydow (Intacto) gave decisive performances in minor movies. Julianne Moore (Far From Heaven) and Jack Nicholson (About Schmidt) were cardinal elements of first-rate movies. In two minor movies - White Oleander and Matchstick Men - Alison Lohman emerged as one the most gifted young American actresses of recent years. Two movie trends of the past year are intriguingly complementary or contradictory. One is a fascination with confidence tricksters - the subject of a cluster of films including Spielberg's Catch Me If You Can, Ridley Scott's Matchstick Men, James Foley's Confidence and Ji Yang's Chinese noir thriller Blind Shaft, where two homicidal con men shake down corrupt coal-mining officials. The world is being manipulated by crafty exploiters. Seemingly contrasted with this is our trust in facts. Increasingly, documentaries, carefully edited from hours of film, are finding sizeable cinema audiences. This year we've had the marvelous French film about a rural teacher and his one-room class, Être et avoir; the hilarious autobiography of the self-destructive movie tycoon Robert Evans, The Kid Stays in the Picture; and a revealing look at the American high school spelling bee, Spellbound

THE FULL LENGTH ANIMATED MOVIE

Far surpassing the popularity of the documentary has been the success of another genre. Its significance has been recognised recently by the introduction of an Oscar for best full-length animated movie. Among a field of cartoon corn there have been three tremendous movies - Finding Nemo by John Lassiter's Pixel team in California, the quirky French animator Sylvain Chomet's Belleville Rendezvous and the Japanese master Hayao Miyazake's Spirited Away. This has been a poor year for world cinema. The best Iranian picture, Crimson Gold, has been banned in its native country, as has the best Chinese movie, Blind Shaft. Except for the steady trickle of subtitled pictures on BBC4, television - most culpably BBC2, Channel 4 and FilmFour - has neglected its cultural duties to foreign films. Yet it has been an ambitious time, although the aspirations have not always been realised. After several years' absence, Quentin Tarantino gave us a coldly immaculate fusion of Western and Eastern styles in Kill Bill: Volume One, first part of a cinematic diptych on which the jury will return its verdict in February. Arriving, complete, from France, was an arthouse product trailing praise that was not entirely justified: Lucas Belvaux's Trilogy, about a fugitive terrorist disrupting Grenoble, went downhill from a strong start. Two other trilogies, each multi-million dollar productions, were completed this autumn with simultaneous premieres around the world. The Wachowski brothers's Matrix trilogy began sensationally but took a nosedive as intellectual pretensions and special effects took over. All the Matrix films have in common with Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy is the presence of the Australian actor Hugo Weaving. Jackson's version of Tolkien's three novels is a triumphant work, an extraordinarily confident undertaking that grew from film to film. Though Hollywood-financed, and drawing in artists from Europe and the US, the movie is an astonishing achievement for New Zealand, which also produced another, rather more modest, inspirational mythic film in Whale Rider  

REVIVAL OF DYING GENRES

Good news was also to be found in the revival of dying genres. Pirates of the Caribbean is the best Jolly Roger swashbuckler since The Crimson Pirate 50 years ago. Even better is Peter Weir's outstanding Master and Commander: The Other Side of the World, which brings to the screen one of Patrick O'Brian's novels of naval life during the Napoleonic Wars. It arrived late in the year alongside Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King and Anthony Minghella's Cold Mountain, true epics all, to excite us by their combination of spectacle and intelligence. They reminded us why we leave home to experience movies on the big screen with wonderfully rich sound and images that tower over us visually yet involve us intimately in their urgent action.

FILM TOP 10 AND TURKEY OF THE YEAR

#1 Adaptation Spike Jonze. #2 Blind Shaft Li Yang. #3 Cold Mountain Anthony Minghella. #4 Crimson Gold Jafar Panahi. #5  Far From Heaven Todd Haynes. #6 Goodbye Lenin! Wolfgang Becker. #7 Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King Peter Jackson. #8 Master and Commander Peter Weir. #9 Mystic River Clint Eastwood. #10 Touching the Void Kevin Macdonald. Turkey of the year: Gigli Martin Brest.

COMEDY OF THE YEAR

Anyone watching the celebration of predictable and undemanding light entertainment that formed the bulk of the British Comedy Awards could run away with the mistaken belief that the best Britain has to offer is Ant and Dec and reruns of Phoenix Nights and The Office. But away from the mainstream, this year has brought plenty of original and inventive comedy, both from established acts and new faces, much of it on the live circuit, but even the terrestrial channels, not often celebrated for their willingness to take risks with new comedy, have come up with some impressive new work.   BBC2, which has been cautious about the new, has begun to gamble again and this year brought three excellent shows. Live Floor Show, hosted by genial and fast-talking Irish comic Dara O'Briain, provided the first TV showcase for stand-up comedy since the glory days of Friday Night Live and throughout the series featured some of the strongest acts on the live circuit, among them Al Murray, Men in Coats, Dan Antopolski, Rich Hall and Adam Hills. But British TV still lacks a show worthy to stand next to New York's Saturday Night Live. In a different vein, Look Around You was a brilliant offbeat spoof of Seventies educational programming, written and performed by Robert Popper and Peter Serafinowicz, and was nominated for both a Bafta and a British Comedy Award; fans will be delighted to hear that a second series has been commissioned. 

THE MOST TALKED TV FILM PROGRAMS

But the most talked-about TV programs (with the exception of The Office Christmas Special) was Little Britain, a sketch show by Matt Lucas and David Walliams which owes a massive debt to The League of Gentlemen and had been the first real triumph for the much-ridiculed BBC3 before it transferred to BBC2 last month. The biggest live event was Eddie Izzard's stadium tour, which arrived here last month after four months in the US and Australia. Izzard is one of the most gifted British stand-ups at work now and it would be unfortunate if his burgeoning film career lured him away from the stage too often. Dylan Moran, Dave Gorman, Al Murray and Ross Noble all went on successful tours; Noble also enjoyed a West End run, as did Bill Bailey, Lenny Henry and Stewart Lee and Richard Thomas's award-winning musical comedy, Jerry Springer: The Opera. The Edinburgh Fringe brought surprises. Last year's Perrier winner, Daniel Kitson, one of the most impressive young stand-ups of recent years, flummoxed his growing fan-base by taking a show that was not stand-up, but a part-serious monologue about love, and which fiercely divided audiences and critics. The Perrier shortlist caused a great deal of huffing by including only one British act, Howard Read (American Demetri Martin won). Again, no women were short listed, but they are getting closer; Lucy Porter, Natalie Haynes, Jo Caulfield, Sarah Kendall might reasonably expect to make next year's shortlist. For obvious reasons, 2003 was a big year for political comedy, but paradoxically the surfeit of potential material only reinforced the truth that political satire is best left to those who specialize in it and can lift it above the usual fish-in-barrel gags about Bush - comics such as Mark Steel, Mark Thomas, Jeremy Hardy and, when he stops talking about himself for long enough, Michael Moore.  Have I Got News For You remains the only comic current affairs programs worth watching, carried entirely by the magnificent double act of Paul Merton and Ian Hislop, and seems to have a new lease of life without the smoothly quipping Angus Deayton, though the novelty of the guest politician presenter is wearing thin; they should get on with appointing the new host from a shortlist of Alexander Armstrong, Dara O'Briain and Jimmy Carr. The last is a far smarter comedian than his not-very-cerebral game shows Your Face or Mine and Distraction on Channel 4 allow him to demonstrate.

COMEDY TOP 10  AND TURKEY OF THE YEAR

#1 Eddie Izzard Sexie, UK tour and DVD. #2 Dave Gorman's Googlewhack Adventure Edinburgh, UK tour. #3 Look Around You BBC2 & DVD. #4 The Sunday Format R4. #5 Bill Bailey Part Troll, Edinburgh and West End. #6 Johnny Vegas Who's Ready for Ice Cream? DVD. #7 Demetri Martin If I, Edinburgh and Soho Theatre. #8 Jimmy Carr's Charm Offensive Edinburgh, London. #9 Dylan Moran Monster, UK tour, #10 Little Britain BBC3 and BBC2. Turkey of the year: Monty Python's Flying Circus in French, Edinburgh. 
 

TELEVISION FILMS OF THE YEAR

America The Beautiful…America The Bountiful!!

"State of Play" was fabulous and Prime Suspect a winner, but the US gave us laughter, tears, sex, war - and Saddam .
As of this writing (as they say in the US) some Extra Special Forces have just captured Saddam. God Bless America and Iraq and Britain because It's A Wonderful Life and No Mistake. Let's crack open the eggnog and sit back with a smuggy sort of 'WMD? What WMD?' smile just in time for Christmas. Or not.   Funny, but all I could think about when I watched footage of the dictator's lice-inspection was that the Americans had apparently sent 600 soldiers to stake out Saddam's hideaway at the same time as they'd forgotten to send a single camcorder, even though they'd remembered to take one along for Jessica Lynch. Where's the footage, guys? What's the big secret? One day, my son may ask me: 'What did you do in the war against terror, mummy?' In which case, I shall say, in a curiously deep voice with an American accent: 'Son, I mostly sat on the sofa and sneered.' Months ago, I observed that if one of the year's big TV moments hadn't been turned into a New York Times bestseller by Thanksgiving at the latest, then I'd eat my combats. No need to, happily, for the suspiciously heart-warming liberation of blonde 19-year-old Jessica Lynch from the Saddam Hussein hospital in Nassariya has now been both best-sellered and mini-seriesed, though sadly I was wrong about the casting of Reese . It was tough for ordinary telly to compete with a proper war embedding itself, uninvited, into our schedules for four dark weeks. When it came to TV drama, the prospect of following the Scud Studs with a bunch of mincing minuetters in doublet and hose seemed, well, entirely inappropriate. There was, I feel sure, other stuff on telly during the war, but I can't remember any of it. Startlingly soon, however, we found it in ourselves, shallow animals that we are, to become interested in things like serial killers in Coronation Street and the rumour that Dirty Den might just be coming home to Albert Square as a lean, tanned corpse. And then, suddenly, we were in the mood for a proper drama, like the fabulous State of Play, the first of Bill 'God' Nighy's three hits of the year, alongside Love, Actually and (though he may not consider it his greatest dramatic stretch) a very funny turn on Grumpy Old Men. But though we could stomach dramas about murder and politics and even journalism (if the hacks were Nighy and John Simm, that is), we were not in the mood at all for 40, which saw national treasure Eddie Izzard become the undeserving victim of Contemporary Dramatitis, symptoms of which include loathsome, two-dimensional, navel-gazing characters, an awesomely pointless plot and witless non sequiturs masquerading as dialogue. Izzard was not alone, either: a good cast, including Hugo Speer, Kerry Fox, Joanne Whalley, Nimmy March, Vincent Regan and Mark Benton (it's been a very busy year for Benton) were forced to make a mid-life drama out of a crisis, which, when it wasn't busy being portentous and pretentious, was just plain unpleasant. Luckily, when it all got too much, the Boohbahs arrived to plump up the daytime schedules: five fat, furry atoms with bulbous tummies, blinking eyes and retractable heads, which sleep nestled in a modernist organic chandelier and at bedtime are whirled away across the world to the rainbow's end - perfect escapism for toddlers of all ages. And then, if you still weren't in the mood for being challenged, there was always the ad for the Honda Accord, which was a small masterpiece. Trash TV never looked trashier than it did in 2003 and even though Big Brother couldn't decide whether to be Big Bore or Big Brothel, it still failed to capture the hearts and minds of the nation. But for top-quality 'ohmigod' watercooler trash, you needed to look no further than almost any edition of Wife Swap, which gripped us guiltily in its vice. Mind you, much as I love a bit of rubbish, I found C4's How Clean Is Your House?, one of the big summer ratings hits, despicably exploitative.

DOCUMENTARIES BEAT DRAMA IN THE RATING

The one-off miracle that was Martin Bashir's Living With Michael Jackson aside, a good documentary will rarely beat a so-so drama in the ratings, though, given the choice, I'd take a documentary any day. Channel 4's strand Cutting Edge can still cut it (the film Bad Behavior was terrifyingly sad but still managed to leave you feeling as though your heart had been pumped full of helium). Meanwhile, in current affairs, the excellent Fighting the War came perhaps a little too hot on the heels of the real thing to engage viewers, but was a brilliant instant rewrite of the first draft of history, while Panorama celebrated turning 50 with a bruising, brutal look at the outcome of 'friendly fire' that came too close to John Simpson for comfort. Other dramas of note included Russell T. Davies's The Second Coming, a fine piece about an ordinary Mancunian Messiah called Steve (Christopher Eccleston) who worked in a video shop and didn't have much luck with the ladies until he claimed to be the Son of God, which came, as it were, not a moment too soon. But for every State of Play, Second Coming, The Deal (Stephen Frears's exemplary slice of dramatic faction with a couple of extraordinary performances from Michael Sheen as Blair and David Morrissey as Brown), Second Generation (a delicious Anglo-Asian tale of romance, betrayal, death and passion featuring the most beautiful cast of the year) or Prime Suspect (perhaps the most completely satisfying of 2003, period), there is, unfortunately, always something that bills itself as 'powerful', 'disturbing' or 'harrowing' and which, invariably, is simply shorthand for another lousy bloody drama about child abuse (this year's was called Real Men). Or something chilly and forgettable in which Amanda Burton does her Amanda Burton thing, or something laughably butch in which Ross Kemp does his Ross Kemp thing, or yet another Cold Feet rip-off, which, inevitably, makes life feel infinitely shorter than it should. But even worse than these is a pointlessly glossy piece like Cambridge Spies, in which male students wear pullovers without holes and the bluestockings have perfect Marcel waves and the art directors are all so terribly chuffed with themselves. On the other hand, a drama such as This Little Life, about the impact on his parents of the birth of a premature baby, was every single thing Real Men aspired to be but failed.

Harrowing without being in any way exploitative, mawkish, gratuitously miserablist or plain tasteless, it was perceptive, life-enhancing and unforgettable. But for the best all-round easy-going entertainment, week in, week out, where did we turn? Curb Your Enthusiasm, The Sopranos, Six Feet Under, Will and Grace, Sex and the City, Friends, Scrubs, Malcolm in the Middle, The Simpsons - name your tune. For these, if not for Dubya, God Bless America.

TV Top 10  MOVIE SHOWS

#1 Prime Suspect ITV1. #2  State of Play BBC1. #3  The Deal C4. #4 The Second Coming ITV1. #5 Second Generation C4. #6 This Little Life BBC2. #7 Wife Swap C4. #8 Canterbury Tales BBC1. #9 Honda Accord ad. #10 Curb Your Enthusiasm BBC4

Favorite Winners and Turkeys of the Year. What Peers and Critics Think?

What were the triumphs and the turkeys of the arts world this year? Those on the scene pick their favorites and reveal their hates. Kathy Burke (Actress):  Electric Six, Big Brovaz, The Darkness and Beyoncé put everyone else in the shade but Electric Six's videos, which made even my dirty old jaw drop, get the vote for outright cheekiness. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time by Mark Haddon put a massive smile on my face. My absolute highlight of the year is The Pillowman by Martin McDonagh at the National. I've seen it twice and plan on going again. A brilliant, spooky play that made me laugh, cry and jump out of my skin. Turkey: this year's Big Brother lost me as a fan. Russell T. Davies (TV writer): Great year for television drama, with State of Play and Prime Suspect. My own cultural revolution came about with Sky Plus, I bloody love it. Turkey: television news just gets thicker and thicker. On all channels, the war brought out a simple, jingoistic reportage. And by the end of the year, we've got ITN reporters telling us that to be with Ian Huntley is to be 'in the presence of evil'. Vital, complicated issues are being reduced to limericks for idiots. We should all be ashamed. Anne Reid (Actress): Scenes from the Big Picture by Owen McCafferty is a play about a day in the lives of 21 people living in Belfast - clearly drawn, rich characters, they're made even more interesting because we are never told what their religious or political affiliations are. It was brilliantly directed at the National Theatre by the great Peter Gill. A Play Without Words, also at the National, knocked me out of my socks. The choreography is stunning. A kaleidoscope of intricate shapes and patterns. It's dramatic with wonderful flashes of comedy. But the pinnacle was at the Festival Theatre, Chichester, where Desmond Olivier Dingle was reading his The Complete History of the Entire World and Shakespeare: The Truth. I laughed until I was in real pain. Turkey: I would like to stuff all those pseudo-eavesdropping actuality programs on TV and put them in a very hot oven. Estelle Morris (Minister for the Arts): It's been a great year for Turner enthusiasts like myself, with shows in all three of the cities closest to my heart: Manchester, Birmingham and London. Turner: The Late Seascapes at the Manchester Art Gallery was wonderful. These are pictures to drink in - as powerful from a distance as they are close to. Some of the work has never been on show in this country, and it is a real privilege to see them at last, and in such impressive surroundings. Equally, Tate Britain's Turner and Venice was tremendous. The Hours is my film of the year. It is a jewel, beautifully structured and powerfully acted. The English National Ballet's Rite of Spring at Sadler's Wells was another triumph. I found the intensity and power of the dancers quite hypnotic, and a stunning complement to Stravinsky's music.  Aaron Barshak (Comic): I thoroughly enjoyed the Titian exhibition (National Gallery). When you look at the vibrant blues and reds, you can see what the Hollywood studios aimed for with Technicolor. In Titian's Allegory of Time Governed by Prudence, it's as if Martin Scorsese has commissioned Titian to do the posters for Casino. At the Edinburgh Festival, nothing so impressed me and made me bellylaugh constantly as Reginald D. Hunter's White Woman show. It taught me that everybody has an idée fixe about other groups of people and that even the most liberal of us can be racist and sexist. The most amazing art show I saw was when I attended Her Majesty's Prison Bullingdon. Charles Saatchi needs to buy the place; a triumph in Brit Art minimalism. I have never seen so many unmade beds under one roof. Turkey: the worst show I attended this year, was indeed my own Edinburgh premiere. Things got better as the run went on, but, according to age-old laws of chivalry, I, a commoner, who had touched a royal personage, had to die, and I did... frequently. Peter Conrad (Author, critic): The two performances I won't ever forget came from divas who respectively specialise in agony and ecstasy: Vanessa Redgrave strung out on morphine in the Broadway production of O'Neill's Long Day's Journey into Night, and the soprano Karita Mattila exposing both soul and body in her glorious, dangerous account of Strauss's Salome at the Paris Opera. The most eye-opening exhibition was Saved! at the Hayward Gallery, sampling the treasures added to our patrimony with some help from the National Art Collections Fund. Nicholas Hytner (Director, National Theatre): Two astonishingly inventive shows did things that were genuinely new to me: Simon McBurney's The Elephant Vanishes at the Barbican and Shunt's Dance Bear Dance under a railway arch in Bethnal Green. I was overwhelmed by a Royal Ballet revival of Kenneth MacMillan's Song of the Earth. Fernando Meirelles's City of God confirmed that South America is now home to the world's most exciting filmmakers. Turkey: I've directed too many turkeys of my own to want to point the finger at anyone else. John Simm (Actor): Glastonbury Festival was incredible this year. We arrived to torrential rain, the sun came out for Echo and the Bunnymen, and from then on, it was three days of joy. Radiohead were stunning, as were Primal Scream, but the highlight for me was The Coral. It was a great year for music, old and new. Missy Elliott, Dizzee Rascal and Blur all pushed things forward, while The Go-Betweens, The Coral, Outkast and The White Stripes all released truly special albums. City of God was the best film I saw this year, it had all the energy and passion of Scorsese's finest work. I also enjoyed Être et avoir and Kill Bill Volume One. On TV I loved David Morrissey as Gordon Brown in The Deal and Chris Eccleston in Flesh and Blood. Stephen Woolley (Film producer): The production of The Pillowman at the Cottesloe; Martin McDonagh's play was astounding. The documentary Être et avoir was wonderful. I also loved the book The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time by Mark Haddon. Turkey: The insufferably boring David Blaine in his glass box. David Lan (Director, Young Vic): The best theatre I saw was Luc Bondy's production of Anatol in Vienna. An exhilaratingly deep reading of it. Merce Cunningham in the midst of Tate Modern's Weather was the most astonishing event, while Peter Sellars's staging of an Artaud monologue at the same address was the most soporific. Manu Chao were played constantly driving into work and Michael Connelly's series of Harry Bosch crime novels proved effective at making the world go away. Colin Murray (Radio One DJ): The Darkness. I reckon that covers music, performance, art, comedy and genius. When we first started playing 'Get Your Hands Off My Woman' on Radio 1, the response was shock and awe. Thumbs up, rock on. Turkey: Elton John being cool again. Stewart Lee (Writer-director, Jerry Springer - The Opera): The best thing I saw this year was the Czech violinist, singer, composer and improviser Iva Bittova solo at St Luke's, Old Street. She came out, stalked the aisles, stared us out, screeched, scraped and soared in a performance that made me laugh, cry, tremble and then clap my hands off. Turkey: The worst thing I saw was the Daredevil movie. There are plastic Daredevil action figures with more charisma than Ben Affleck.

Alexei Sayle (Comedian and novelist): My cultural highlight was the anti-war demo. As the son of communists, my teenage years gave me an aversion to going on demonstrations. There's nothing a young man wants more than to be seen by all the cool kids walking down the road with a load of old loonies shouting about peace. Yet I have attended every anti-war demo this year and felt enthusiasm and hope. Turkey: The fake one Bush pretended to serve to the troops on Thanksgiving Day on his 11-minute visit to Iraq. Nothing symbolizes the fraudulent, manipulative way the invasion was promoted more than that rubber bird. Tim Firth (Writer, Calendar Girls and the musical Our House): The Liverpool Philharmonic Children's Concert season for their unpatronising irreverence - particularly the bloke who played 'The Flight Of The Bumble Bee' dressed as the Grim Reaper. The year would have been much duller without Cobblestone Runway by Ron Sexsmith, who looks 15, sounds 50 and writes heartbreaking melodies with unfashionably optimistic lyrics. Watching Gypsy on Broadway was an object lesson in musical book-writing. The movie highlight was the Loach-esque street-child assassination scene in Meirelles's City of God. Turkey: Martin Bashir. Beware the documentary maker who starts to use the word 'I' too much. Tony Clark (Artistic director, Hampstead Theatre): Two new plays have stayed with me: Darwin in Malibu - Crispin Whittell's witty comedy, and Roy Williams's Fallout. Taking the children to Olafur Eliasson's installation at Tate Modern was joyful and serene. Turkey: Perhaps people could stop marking artistic enterprise with stars in 2004?

REVIEWS OF MAJOR RELEASES OF THE YEAR

DAY AFTER TOMORROW: BIG, LOUD WITH A MESSAGE TO CONSIDER. Rating: 4 stars

The world hangs in the balance when global warming brings on catastrophic floods, hurricanes and earthquakes, leading perilously to the next Ice Age. A lone scientist (Dennis Quaid) tries to reverse the weather patterns while rescuing his son (Jake Gyllenhaal) from New York City where the weather will soon destroy the city. The Day After Tomorrow is a big, loud, summer action movie masquerading as a cautionary tale with social and political relevance. The film's cataclysm of climatologically chaos turns the northern hemisphere into tundra more frozen than Lambeau Field. Yet it also manages to bring people -- the right people, namely the film's stars -- and enlighten them at the right moments. High school students Sam (Jake Gyllenhaal) and Laura (Emmy Rossum) fall in love while trying to avoid freezing to death in the New York Public Library (though we know they can't possibly die, because they're too good-looking).Sam's estranged parents, Professor Jack Hall (Dennis Quaid) and Dr. Lucy Hall (Sela Ward), seem likely to reconcile, thanks to the pouring rain and driving snow. A homeless man (Glenn Plummer), with his trusty border collie in tow, teaches a rich kid from Manhattan's Upper East Side (Austin Nichols) how to keep warm using paper. And most important of all, the vice president of the United States, who just happens to resemble Dick Cheney, realizes only in the aftermath of mass destruction that, maybe he should have listened to warnings about the dangers of global warming. The familiar-looking, 50-ish president, meanwhile, doesn't say much as the situation worsens and leaves the big decisions to everyone else.(This, surprisingly, from a film being distributed by 20th Century Fox, which is owned by the Fox News Channel's conservative parent company -- your fair and balanced source for disastertainment.) Director and co-writer Roland Emmerich, who blew up the White House in Independence Day, seems to want it all here. He wants to preach environmentalism, yet pummel his audience with dizzying sight and sound. He wants to put his characters in peril, yet have them utter something witty as they're about to die. One guy who crashes through the glass ceiling of a mall jokes that he just thought he'd drop in for a little shopping. (Groan.) Yet for all its spectacular visual effects -- including tidal waves that flood Manhattan and freezing temperatures that cause British military helicopters to plummet from the sky -- the movie's most thrilling, terrifying event is one of the simplest: turbulence in an airplane as Sam and some classmates fly from Washington to New York. That's the most realistic force to fear, and the only one likely to make you feel truly anxious. Tornadoes that spin through downtown Los Angeles are actually a joke, simply because they have such remarkably good aim. They take out landmarks like the Hollywood sign and the Capitol Records building, along with a TV reporter who's breathlessly trying to tell the world what's happening around him. (Though how the twisters made it through traffic on the freeways is a mystery.) Conversely, watching New Yorkers scurry for their lives remains unsettling -- even though it's been nearly three years since Sept. 11, and even though the source of terror this time is a computer-generated storm. In the midst of all this is Sam, waiting for his father to rescue him as promised. If that means walking through blizzard conditions from Philadelphia to New York, Jack Hall will do it -- even though he's the only scientist in world who predicted all this deadly weather, and is usually the smartest guy in the room. "When this storm is over, we'll be in a new ice age," he warns several serious-faced government officials before embarking on his journey. By then, the box office will already have been heating up, and that's all that really seems to matter.

CINEMA: FILM REVIEW

Day after tomorrow - fact or fiction? This summer's Hollywood blockbuster movie - The Day after tomorrow - shows the Earth in the grip of a new ice age caused by climate change (also known as global warming). But do we really need to worry? We help you sort out the science from the science fiction. Although the depiction of the science is exaggerated and at times misleading the scale of the threat and the underlying politics are all too true.

Is climate change happening? Yes. Over the last century temperatures rose by 0.6oC. 2003 saw a number of highly unusual weather events including: Droughts in Southern Africa , Forest fires in Siberia, Flooding in South America .The idea that climate change is harmless and will just mean nicer weather is dangerously wrong. What else? Temperatures are predicted to rise by between 1.4 and 5.8oC during this century. This might not seem very much but... A warming of just 2 to 3oC would put: 3 billion people at risk of water shortages, 300 million extra exposed to malaria, 100 million more at risk from coastal flooding. Could it happen overnight? The climate could change dramatically over 10-20 years. It would be extremely difficult for us and the natural world to adjust. The film uses one possible scenario for abrupt climate change - changes to Atlantic Ocean currents creating a cooling effect on Northern Europe. But it's very difficult to say how likely this scenario is as there simply isn't enough data. Can we stop climate change? Only if we all - Governments, organizations and individuals - take real action to combat it. Some, like the current US administration, still need a wake up call. Others are rising to the challenge.

BETWEEN FICTION, NONFICTION AND POLITICS

The world's going to hell in a hand basket. Tornadoes in Los Angeles. The ice age in Manhattan. Earthquakes, tidal waves, unbelievable gridlock. The cause of all this consternation, Dennis Quaid's professor character in the film tells us, is global warming. The movie was said to be inspired by the cataclysmic tome The Coming Global Superstorm. Murdoch presumably is hoping the special effects, if not the topic, will fatten the Fox bottom line. Gore definitely is hoping the topic, if not the end-of-the-world imagery, will make audiences think about the environmental bottom line. "I do want to take advantage of the opportunity presented by the movie...to talk about what the real issues are," Gore told reporters in a telephone press conference last week. To that end, Gore has teamed with the activist group, MoveOn.org, to publicize an education campaign on global warming and the greenhouse effect timed to the release of The Day After Tomorrow. MoveOn.org volunteers are being encouraged to buy tickets to the film's Memorial Day opening weekend, and hand out informational flyers to other moviegoers. The flyers, MoveOn.org executive director Peter Schurman told reporters, "will answer questions people will have" after seeing the film. (Make that, questions about global warming. It's unlikely the organization knows what Day After costar Jake Gyllenhaal 's intentions are toward Kirsten Dunst.)  Schurman said Fox has been notified of its plans, and its representatives invited to a May 24 so-called town hall rally in New York City featuring Gore and environmentalist Bobby Kennedy Jr. Fox, for its part, has agreed to screen the film for Gore and a small group of others before the film's gala premiere, also scheduled for May 24 in New York City. Outside of that lone coordinated effort, the two sides will go their own ways. Fox will push Day After as a big-budget summer flick from the director of  Independence Day  (with a nod to the environment through its partnership with Future Forests, a London-based company that shows businesses how to minimize their carbon-dioxide emissions); Gore's camp will push Day After as an important, if exaggerated, cautionary tale. We think it's wonderful for the movie," Fox spokeswoman Florence Grace says of the MoveOn.org campaign. "The issues addressed [make the film] all the more topical, all the more interesting. We think it's great." Certainly mountains of op-ed articles and months of pre-release protest only served to fuel box-office receipts for Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ ($368.9 million and counting through last weekend). No one thinks Gore and MoveOn.org are going to supply a Passion-like bump for Day After, but Mitch Litvak, president of the entertainment marketing firm The L.A. Office, says the free publicity, even in the form of an environmental lecture, can't hurt. "[Among] younger moviegoers there's such a strong interest in seeing the film based on the early advance trailer, adults may not think it's right for them," said Litvak. "What MoveOn does is make it relevant to them." "It's kind of like the Good Housekeeping seal of approval." Fox'll take it, politics be damned. Says Dergarabedian: "Any extra butt you can put in a movie seat is an extra 10 bucks in the pocket of the studio and the theater."

SHREK2: Originality and Delightful Animation Sequences. Rating: Three and a half stars out of four.

Whatever was wrong with Shrek -- and there were more weaknesses than its beloved status would suggest -- has been eradicated or improved upon with Shrek 2, a rare example of a sequel that's better than the original. The computer-generated animation, which dazzled the first time in 2001, looks even better. The backgrounds and landscapes are even more lush and detailed, from the realistic drops of water during a thunderstorm to the contours left in the snow after a horse-drawn carriage has rumbled through. The characters' movements are smoother, not as herky-jerky -- especially those of Princess Fiona (voiced by Cameron Diaz) -- all of which contributes to the sensation of watching something truly filmic, not digitally manufactured. But the most important change of all, and the most fundamental, is in the screenplay. While the Shrek script consisted of little more than a litany of pop culture references, many of which already felt stale, Shrek 2 has a strong story line, with more fully developed characters. The in-jokes that do exist here seem relevant, including a clever little reference to Justin Timberlake, Diaz's real-life beau. A send-up of COPS -- called KNIGHTS, in keeping with the fairy-tale theme -- is a fast-paced, dead-on riot. Other pop culture references -- to movie musicals, Beverly Hills cliches and old Hollywood -- seem classic and more likely to withstand the test of time, unlike those in the first Shrek, which included tired takeoffs on The Matrix and the Macarena. These, of course, are intended to entertain the adults in the audience -- and they'll succeed -- but there's plenty to keep the kids happy, too. Shrek 2, like the first, is bright, light and colorful, with a non-stop energy that's infectious. Several strong supporting characters and actors have been added to the already-solid lineup of returning vocal talent, led by Mike Myers as the lovable ogre, Shrek, Eddie Murphy as his perpetually perky sidekick, Donkey, and Diaz. Picking up right where the original left off, Shrek 2 begins with the newly married ogre couple returning from their honeymoon and receiving an invitation to visit Princess Fiona's parents, King Harold (John Cleese) and Queen Lillian (Julie Andrews), who rule over the kingdom of Far, Far Away. Donkey tags along. Upon first meeting the boorish Shrek, the in-laws don't exactly approve. While the queen eventually tries to be conciliatory, the king and Shrek get into a passive-aggressive shouting match over dinner in which they tear apart all the food on the table (and each other, almost). Meanwhile, Fiona's fairy godmother (voiced decadently by Jennifer Saunders from Absolutely Fabulous) is astonished to learn that the princess has been married. Her son, the self-obsessed, blond-tressed Prince Charming (Rupert Everett), was supposed to have rescued Fiona from the tower and lived happily ever after with her -- but he got there too late. This brings us to the most fantastic addition of all to the Shrek series: Puss-in-Boots, a tabby cat decked out in tiny Zorro duds and voiced by Antonio Banderas, in a nod to his starring role in The Mask of Zorro in 1998. Puss-in-Boots is sent to take out Shrek, which would make way for a fairy-tale ending for Fiona and Prince Charming. Instead, the kitty ends up warming to the big green guy and fighting on his side, even after Shrek has undergone a medieval version of Extreme Makeover, thinking that's what Fiona really wants in a husband. The character alternates with catlike agility between sword-fighting bravado and saucer-eyed vulnerability, and Banderas plays him with a sexual ambiguity that adds a hilariously subversive layer of humor to the film. You could easily imagine him slashing and purring his way to his own movie. The moral of the story -- that love conquers all, despite appearances -- is the same as the first movie. Even that element is conveyed with a lighter touch this time, something that seems unlikely in a film with three directors and about a half-dozen screenwriters.

 

KILL BILL: Vol. 2 less cartoonish: More emotional resonance than first half. Rating: 3stars out of five

If Kill Bill: Vol. 1 was like a roundhouse kick to the head, Kill Bill: Vol. 2 is practically a warm hug. Oh, there's still plenty of violence in the second half of Quentin Tarantino's samurai-kung fu-spaghetti western-blaxploitation megamix. A knock-down, drag-out cat fight in which Uma Thurman and Daryl Hannah destroy a trailer (and each other) with amazonian fury is a prime example. There just isn't the kind of cartoonish blood and gore that saturated the first film, which came out last fall. Vol. 2 ends on a note that could almost be described as heartwarming, with Thurman's character -- a vengeful assassin known as The Bride -- finding happiness in a traditional way. Is Tarantino going soft? Hardly. Vol. 2 is every bit as thrilling as the first, but it also features more of the stylized, rhythmic dialogue that has become the writer-director's trademark through films like Pulp Fiction. This gives the second film an emotional resonance that the first lacked, and it brings the enormity of the whole project into perspective. I'd still like to see both parts shown together in a theatre; cinematographer Robert Richardson shot Kill Bill so breathtakingly and in so many varied styles, it seems that watching the film in its entirety at home on DVD wouldn't do it justice. Tarantino has said he released Vol. 2 several months after Vol. 1 because it would have been too much of a sensory overload for audiences to sit through the whole thing at once. I was among the many critics who decried Miramax's decision to divide the film as "a marketing ploy to get filmgoers to pay twice." I'd be curious now, though, to experience both halves melded together. The cliffhanger ending of Vol. 1 revealed that the baby taken from The Bride while she was in a coma is still alive. In Vol. 2, she sets out to get revenge on the rest of her former comrades in the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad who tried to kill her on her wedding day. There's Budd (Michael Madsen), the sleazy brother of her former lover and boss, Bill. There's the eyepatch-wearing Elle Driver (Hannah), who has become the top killer in The Bride's absence. And, of course, there's Bill himself -- represented only in rich, baritone voiceovers in Vol. 1 but now a main character played by David Carradine. And what a fabulous casting choice Carradine is to play the charming, dangerous Bill; he's one of Tarantino's idols from his television role in Kung Fu, but he also has such gravitas about him, such a look of experience on his weathered face, he's truly magnetic. Despite the twisted nature of the relationship between Bill and The Bride, their scenes together are surprisingly moving. They also buzz with tension because we know from the title alone what she plans to do to him. In flashbacks, we see another of Tarantino's idols, Chinese film veteran Gordon Liu, challenging The Bride as her martial arts instructor. Their scenes together have a campy authenticity, with the camera zooming in quickly on his face to catch the twitch in his white eyebrows as he barks out orders and insults. "Your anger amuses me," he tells The Bride in subtitles. "Do you think you are my match?" But the training also showcases Thurman's intensity and athleticism. Some critics said her character wasn't developed enough in part 1; she is here, and while she's an intimidating spectacle to behold, she also gets to show a softer side. And that's a deadly combination.

TOM RAIDER

Lara Croft is back. The character, played again by Angelina Jolie and based on the Tomb Raider video game,  hits the big screen on July 25 in "Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life." The film begins in a sweeping rush over the water toward Santorini, the volcanic Greek island best known for the Late Bronze Age site Akrotiri with its magnificent frescoes. We don't get to see the frescoes, however, because an earthquake strikes! The quake has shaken loose wonderful things from an ancient seafloor site, and the next day treasure hunters are diving in the area and pulling up bronze statues. When Croft makes her appearance, her crew of looters complains, "Half the world's raiders are here and you make us wait." But she has pinpointed the source of the antiquities--the Luna Temple, built, she says, by Alexander the Great, and swallowed up by the sea in 330 B.C. In reality, scuba diving in Greek waters is highly restricted and anyone lifting up bronzes like this would be arrested in a flash, such actions violating laws dating back to 1932. So the movie would be over in ten minutes, if this were reality. Since it isn't, Lara Croft can simply grab something and say, "It's mine!" A Chinese tomb-raiding gang intervenes, however, stealing from Croft the mysterious glowing orb she was stealing from Greece. The gang is obviously up to no good, but it's interesting to note, later in the film, they take more care with artifacts they're plundering (packing them in crates) than Lara's associates (who are of the stuff-a-big-sack-full-of-loot old school). It turns out the gang is in cahoots with the real bad guy: Jonathan Reiss, Nobel Prize winner, bioweapons designer, and "modern-day Dr. Mengele." Says the disease monger Reiss, "I've branched out--archaeology." He's using the orb to find Pandora Box which Croft warns is "A weapon more powerful than you can imagine." (Well, given anthrax, nuclear bombs, etc., I think I could imagine.) In the myth, of course, Pandora's Box was opened and all the evils it contained, like gout, escaped. The box should be as empty as Al Capone's vault, but this is Hollywood. So that's the basic idea--the movie is one long chase sequence, including motorcycling on the Great Wall, little wonder China refused permission for them to film there. The stand-in for China? Llyn Gwynant, near Beddgelert in Wales, and a computer-generated Great Wall (according to a BBC report, the film industry in Wales had been hard hit by foot-and-mouth disease). Other archaeological window-dressing in the film includes a cave filled with terra-cotta warriors, copied from those in the tomb of China's first emperor, Shihuangdi. Oh, yes, it isn't strictly archaeological, but what looks like Grendel, the monster from Beowulf, and a number of his siblings do make a guest appearance. As in her first movie, Lara Croft employs a number of special archaeological skills and gear, stuff they don't teach you about in fieldschools: use of the bo (staff) in fighting (in case your guns and knives aren't handy), lots of knives (good for stabbing people and prying out medallions from statues), extra-loud motorcycles (for sneaking up on bad guys), piloting space-shuttle-like gliders (to avoid immigration when entering foreign countries), rappelling upside-down and shooting at bad guys (but missing your own toes), more knives (so you can slash your own arm and make yourself into shark-bait to escape bad guys), parachuting from buildings (to escape more bad guys), jet ski stunts (just to show you can do it), rifle and bayonet drills (for sticking it to persistent bad guys), special-edition jeep (for terrorizing flocks of flamingoes and ostriches), etc. The movie is better than the first--which hauled in more than $274 million worldwide and had a $48 million box-office opening weekend, the most ever for a female-driven movie, according to Viacom--so it is sure to be a commercial success. In the pantheon of archaeology-related adventure movies, it recalls the original Indiana Jones movie, "Raiders of the Lost Ark," and uses the tried-and-true formula, replacing the Ark of the Covenant with Pandora's Box, and Nazis with a bioweapons merchant who thinks many of the world's inhabitants are unfit to live. For all its entertainment value, there's nothing here of any redeeming value in terms of archaeology. It's unfortunate; I don't think it has to be that way, even with a character based on a video game. Oh well, maybe they'll do a third movie in which we'll see Lara Croft at a scholarly meeting presenting a paper on long-distance trade and kinship ties in Assyria based on her trace element analysis of metal artifacts (maybe ancient knives?) and newly translated cuneiform tablets.  I can see it now...as a distinguished professor in a tweed jacket and bow tie raises his hand to object to her conclusion, Croft reaches for her cutlery.... Hmmm. Maybe it's better to not worry about archaeology if you go to this movie. Pointing out the archaeological flaws in "Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life" is probably an unnecessary undertaking, but here are a couple of things I spotted in the one viewing of the movie I had. There must be others. Big problems with the Luna Temple. Luna was a Roman moon goddess (actually the Oxford Classical Dictionary says Sabine), so Alexander wouldn't have erected a temple to her. The Greek equivalent would have been Selene. The temple sank in 330 B.C., says Lara, but Alexander didn't get to the Indus River--where the box supposedly was found--until 326, so there's a chronological disjunction there. Also, the box is said to have been responsible for a plague among Alexander's army, but the ancient author Arrian's The Campaigns of Alexander makes no mention of a plague there, the box, or, of course, the Luna Temple.

 

 Moreover, I don't think there's any record of an earthquake in 330 or the following years. There was one in 373 B.C., which produced a tsunami that destroyed the Greek city of Helike, near Corinth, and another earthquake must have been responsible for the tsunami that devastated Tryphon of Apamaea's army as it marched along the Syrian coast near the city of Ptolemais in the second century B.C. But not in 330. Meanwhile, in China, the gang of looters is busily plundering a Buddhist cave filled with terra-cotta warriors. Well, the Buddha lived ca. 563-483 B.C., and the emperor Shihuangdi, whose warriors were copied for the film, ruled from 221 to 210 B.C. But the problem--aside from what such statues would be doing in a Buddhist cave in the first place--is that the religion didn't spread to China until the first century A.D. Ooops! Tomb Raider, a big-budget action movie from Paramount. The first five minutes--an Egyptian setting, lots of gun fire, and a homicidal robot--set the tone and pace for the rest of the film. The plot is simple: An alignment of all nine planets plus a solar eclipse takes place in one week. In that time Lara Croft, played by Angelina Jolie, has to find a missing key, racing a secret society known as the Illuminati to gain possession of it. A disk with ancient-looking engravings (an Egyptian protective eye motif is prominent), the key was forged during the last such alignment 5,000 years ago. The amulet gave power over time to the inhabitants of a lost city, a heavily tattooed people to judge by the one who appears on screen.

Abuse of the key led to the destruction of the city, located in Iceland but looking like a Khmer-Mesoamerican hybrid. To prevent its future misuse, the key was broken in half and hidden. The Illuminati are apparently heirs of the original bad guys from 5,000 years ago, and if they get their paws on the key we're all in big trouble. The movie is based on the Lara Croft character from the Tomb Raider video game by Eidos Interactive. Paramount, which is owned by Viacom, hopes the film will capitalize on the video game's popularity--since its 1996 debut, it has sold more than 21 million units, pulling in over $500 million, and has over 1,000 fan sites on the web. The video game has been featured in Time, Newsweek, Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, and Details magazines. Angelina Jolie appears on the Entertainment Weekly cover coinciding with the film's opening. Lara Croft has yet to appear in academic publications such as the American Journal of Archaeology, Antiquity, and Archäologische Anzeiger. On the other hand, the video game is popular among anthropology and archaeology students and Lara Croft is said to be a favorite at Halloween costume parties on campus.What's the literary and cinematic heritage of the Lara Croft character and Tomb Raider approach to archaeology?

I think you can trace it through the Indiana Jones films and Jewel of the Nile, plus a dose of the Clint Eastwood character "Dirty Harry" with his penchant for using large guns to shoot things, to old smash-and-grab archaeology-adventure writing geared toward adolescent boys, like H. Rider Haggard's King Solomon's Mines. Lara Croft owes a bit to James Bond and to Emma Peel from the old Avengers television series, with maybe a hint of Edgar Rice Burroughs' Tarzan for the British nobility touch, the ape-man actually being Lord Greystoke. Supporting Lara Croft in the film are two stock characters, her butler (see Bunter from the Lord Peter Wimsey mystery novels and Jeeves from P.G. Wodehouse's Bertie Wooster stories) and a bumbling computer-geek inventor (see Q from the James Bond movies and Jerry Lewis in The Nutty Professor). For the film we also have the similarly stock ancient advanced people who fell into evil, bringing down their civilization (see Atlantis). Is there any real archaeology in the film? Most of what's there is backdrop, much of the film being shot at Angkor in Cambodia. (In an AP report, Jolie is quoted as saying, "It's the most amazing place I've ever been to in my life.") The only person identified in the film as an archaeologist, other than Lara Croft, works for an auction house, apparently supplying it with looted artifacts. There is an attempt in the script to give the Lara Croft character some depth, shown in her devotion to her deceased parents, especially her father, but it is swamped by other aspects of the video game's character: "Think James Bond crossed with Indiana Jones...in a Wonderbra" (Entertainment Weekly) and "a high-flying pinup version of Indiana Jones" (JAM! Movies). That's too bad. Not that this is really anything other than an action movie. As you might expect, the film credits are loaded with special effects, visual effects, and stunt people. My favorite on the credit list is Joss Skottowe, Weapons Supervisor. Not somebody you'd find on an archaeological field school. While preparing for her role, Jolie was said to be "on a strict training regimen of gymnastics, bungee jumping, kickboxing, weight training and the use of machine guns," according to an AFP report last September. Should we consider revising the archaeology curriculum on the university level?

THE WORST AND GROSSEST FILMS OF THE YEAR

GIGLI: WORST MOVIE OF THE YEAR, PAR EXCELLENCE! Gigli is so carelessly made and performed that it is much like that can of cranberry sauce. Recently, I heard a great story that is probably untrue. Jennifer Lopez was in Vancouver at a yuppie grocer shopping for ingredients to make her man, Ben Affleck, a turkey dinner. Faced with the difficult decision of which kind of cranberry sauce to buy, chunky or smooth, she inquired of the clerk: "Which is sexier?" Though factually suspect (turkey in July?), it's a delicious image: The private Jennifer Lopez has so internalized the public image of sizzlin' hot J.Lo that even cranberry sauce is forced to play a part in the ongoing rock video now substituting for her actual life. Gigli is so carelessly made and performed that it is much like that can of cranberry sauce: just another prop to further J.Lo's plan for world domination. It is perhaps not their fault (though maybe it is) that with the splitting of David and Liza, Ben and Jen are officially the world's favourite doomed couple. But please, all you fans of her perfume and his pointed baby teeth, don't write to remind me that they're human; I don't believe it. I know a few, and humans are not this robotic or waxy, nor do they wear matching cancerous tans as a sign of togetherness. With every Us magazine cover promoting their superstardom, Lopez and Affleck get farther from their status as "actors." Then again, Gigli has nothing to do with acting. The film is simply a scrapbook for Ben and Jen so they can cherish on DVD the early days of their relationship. It is a trivial keepsake with a trivial plot: Affleck plays Gigli ("Rhymes with 'really,' "), a hood so inept that a watchdog gangster is appointed to make sure he doesn't screw up the task of kidnapping Brian (Justin Bartha), a mentally challenged teenaged boy. The watchdog is Lopez, a lesbian who quotes Sun Tzu, thus indicating depth. At this juncture, as at many throughout the day, J.Lo's ass deserves examination. It is the picture's true star. Lopez is so droolingly shot that director Martin Brest (Scent of a Woman) must have needed tiny windshield wipers to clear the spit from his lens. Granted, it is a remarkable ass: It can do yoga, enter and exit rooms and make pizza (probably). But there is something less joyful about the ass this time round; one might even note a touch of melancholy in its sway.

In the beginning, circa Selena, Jennifer Lopez stepped into public life like a serious person, a woman defiant in the face of conventional beauty standards, proud of her Latino heritage and her butt. Now her ass is just another jar of cranberry sauce greasing the wheels of the J.Lo Machine. In other words, does all that ass serve the plot or flesh out Lopez's character? Nu-uh. We learn nothing about this woman called Ricki except that she has terrible diction -- "brew-uhl," instead of "brut-al." Lopez once played a convincing toughie in Out of Sight, where her ass was a magnificent prop because it was withheld; a mere glimpse sent stronger men than George Clooney a-swooning. But Jennifer is not about withholding; recently, these two publicity sluts let millions of people watch them cooking on Dateline NBC. Suddenly one recalls with fondness how Sean Penn used to lash out at photographers to protect his relationship; at least he and Madonna sold the illusion that there was something to protect, not just something to promote. In Gigli, Affleck is his usual lazy self. As a performer, he's coasted on a minute amount of charisma for so long that it's hard to remember what we liked about him in the first place -- oh yeah, he can play a good doofus (Good Will Hunting). Yet engaged in banal banter about the benefits of vaginas and the deficits of penises, even Affleck looks a little too smart for the part. The un-dynamic duo are on screen virtually every second, not so much talking as delivering monologue after monologue, each as dull and inexorably cute ("Gobble, gobble," is her oral sex come-on; again with the turkey obsession?) as, one imagines, their real-life conversations. If they are this devoid of chemistry in private, I give it 11 months. Every once in a while an actor pops by to reveal the two for the amateurs that they are. In a cameo, Christopher Walken actually understands the oddball pitch to which the script aspires.

 Al Pacino, as a preening godfather, is typically over-expressed, but at least he follows the basic principle that a character must be invested with a personality -- even a new voice, and mannerisms! -- distinct from the one the actor uses on Letterman. All of these complaints -- the flat comedy, the mediocre acting by big stars, another incomprehensible gangster plot -- could be levied against any number of movies; it seems unfair to single out Ben and Jen just because they're popular. But, due to two subplots, Gigli is odious even without their presence. First, the lesbian cure. Affleck already converted one luscious Sappho in Chasing Amy, a much livelier look at fence jumping; Gigli is all the more casually offensive in comparison. It is not actually an ontological truth that all lesbians would cease their gay ways if Ben Affleck came knocking. Gigli is mean to his mother (Lainie Kazan), dresses in tracksuits and lives in a home without books. Who wouldn't renounce their sexual orientation for this prize package, especially when the only other lesbian present -- Ricki's ex -- is a raging, suicidal maniac? Second, the Noble Handicapped Savior subplot. The final line of Seabiscuit rang through my head as soon as twitchy young Brian entered stage left: "Some people think we saved him -- but in a way, he saved us." Such is the destiny of Brian and all young actors who suffer the same unidentified illness that befell Leonardo DiCaprio in What's Eating Gilbert Grape? The kid is ritually humiliated for our amusement -- forced to rap Sir Mix-a-Lot's Baby Got Back -- and exists solely to make J.Lo and Affleck appear selfless, a Herculean task not so different from the audience's. We are all in service to the celebrities we create. We are all cranberry sauce.

"WEDDING" IS THE GROSSEST OF THEM ALL!

The third American Pie movie delivers what fans expect: Cringe worthy gags.The tone for American Wedding is set in the first 10 minutes when the lead character, Jim Levenstein, is very publicly pantless. Twice. High art it ain't, but if you are a fan of the American Pie movies, this third installment delivers what its audience expects and goes a little further in the gross-out department than either of its predecessors. Hard to imagine, but true. For those who have never seen an American Pie installment, a little history. Originally the story of four high school buddies who make a bet to lose their virginity by prom night, the movies follow the bumbling Jim (Jason Biggs), cerebral Finch (Eddie Kaye Thomas), loyal Kevin (Thomas Ian Nicholson) and thoroughly venal Stifler (Seann William Scott). In the first film, Jim's buddies tell him that sex feels like the inside of an apple pie, hence the title and Jim's penchant for getting caught with his pants down. There's Michelle (Allison Hannigan), the geeky band camp girl with carnal appetites, and Jim's earnest and well meaning dad, played by the wonderful Eugene Levy. Pie II was a summer college story. For the third run around, the boys have now finished college. Jim and Michelle are engaged and the movie follows the weeks leading up to their big day. Jim is hell-bent on giving Michelle the wedding of her dreams, so there are sub-plots about tracking down the dress designer du jour, learning how to dance and making sure the flowers are just so. For some unknown reason the boys have gone from tolerating Stifler's uncouth behavior to despising him, and the lout is not invited to the wedding. That doesn't stop the Stifmeister once he gets a look at Michelle's gorgeous sister Cadence (January Jones), who will be acting as maid of honor. In one of the comedic moments that can make it into a family newspaper, Stifler goes preppy/polite to win over Cadence, while Finch becomes a vulgar boor, also to win Cadence. Then there's the mandatory bachelor party with strippers that goes very, very wrong, and an incident with an electric shaver and Jim's private parts.  The dance-off between Stifler and a large gay man is entertaining, although it does drag on a little too long. Too many of the really funny scenes in American Wedding would be ruined if described, so I'll stop right here. Suffice it to say, if you're a fan, you'll howl and cringe in all the appropriate places. Familiarity with the first two American Pie movies is a must if you want to get all the inside jokes. If none of the above describes you, proceed with caution. You have been warned.

 SECOND RATE MOVIES OF THE YEAR

RUNWAY JURY: Don't Waste Your Time! The novels of John Grisham are like cinematic Sea Monkey kits: just add film and the freeze-dried characters jump to life, creating a solid timewaster that's not terribly memorable. Runaway Jury won't leave you feeling cheated out of two hours and $12, but it's not going to help you reach a higher plane, either. The movie packs its courtroom with some fairly big names -- even some of the secondary characters are medium-sized, B+list talent like Jennifer Beals and Jeremy Piven. The story starts with one of those senseless workplace shootings by a recently fired employee, and then cuts to two years later and the start of a trial that pits the widow of one of the victims against the gun manufacturer. In the novel it's big tobacco, but the filmmakers apparently found first-hand bullets a more visceral threat than second-hand smoke. Dustin Hoffman plays a goodhearted lawyer of the people, so of course he represents the plaintiff and dresses down. I find as he ages he more and more resembles Tootsie in drag, and his Southern accent just adds to that impression. On the evil side is Gene Hackman, hired by a consortium of cigar-smoking, jowly suits to do whatever it takes for the gun company to win this case. He strides into the courtroom in an early scene and inhales: "Furniture polish, cheap cologne and body odour," he says, relishing the stink. He's in love with the idea that people can be divided into the wicked and the stupid, and it's clear where he places himself. Enter John Cusack, wearing that pouty, confused look his fans demand no matter the role. He and Rachel Weisz are the wild cards in this stacked deck -- while Hoffman's lawyer puts his faith in justice and Hackman in his evil tricks, these two hatch a scheme to control the outcome from the inside, for a price. Cusack uses reverse psychology to get on the jury, and Weisz starts phoning Hoffman and Hackman, telling them $10-million will buy them the verdict of their choice. Director Gary Fleder, conscious that courtrooms involve a lot of sitting around, never keeps the camera still for more than a few seconds. The first 30 minutes of Runaway Jury rush by like an episode of The West Wing, where conversations can only continue as long as people are striding purposefully down corridors, or at the very least riding in cars. Even when characters have to take the stand or sit down to eat, the camera continues to whirl dizzily about the room. It's the only dizzifying thing about the film, however. Plotting and exposition are arrow-straight, and any twist is as clearly signposted as a gas station on the Trans-Canada. Even a little gag about the blind juror who becomes the foreman is announced twice, with a shot of the blind figure of Justice in front of the courtroom, then by the fellow juror who remarks, "Sure he's blind, but so's Justice!" This is a movie where you can duck out to refill your giant cup of cola beverage, certain you'll be able to pick up the thread when you return. Still, it's fun to watch everyone sail through this story. Hackman barks orders, grinds his teeth and throws telephones around, and sets up his command centre with giant plasma screens where a lesser evil character would make do with boxy computer monitors -- no sense in rigging the jury with jury-rigged equipment. None of the leads are required to stretch, so they look relaxed in their roles, which isn't a bad thing. We get a few little plot twists, a bit of overly moral speechifyin' by Hoffman, and some satisfying gavel-banging by the judge. Movie adjourned.

PLATH: Paltrow plays suicidal poet Sylvia Plath: A dreary film bio that offers little insight. No disrespect intended, but you may never be happier to see a writer carted out of her home feet-first than you will with Sylvia. That moment signals the end is mercifully at hand to this dreary film biography that offers little insight into the character of suicidal poet Sylvia Plath. Sylvia, with Gwyneth Paltrow in the title role, presents a woman so unswervingly bound for death by her own hand that her terrible journey ends up feeling monotonous and her actual suicide anti-climatic. When she's not trying to kill herself, Paltrow's Plath talks about doing the deed, recounting past failed attempts at suicide and spouting such cheery lines as, "Dying is an art, like everything else.

I do it exceptionally well." No one expects a trip to Disney World in a biopic about Plath. But there has to be more to the woman than the relentless gloom and single-minded devotion to self-annihilation presented by director Christine Jeffs. Only early on, with Plath's whirlwind romance and marriage in 1956 to future British poet laureate Ted Hughes (Daniel Craig), does Sylvia rise above a suicide watch. Here, Paltrow and Craig capture moments of passion -- and the few signs of a poet's soul Sylvia possesses -- as they engage in speed recitations with friends or float by boat along a stream, with Plath calling lines of Chaucer in Middle English to cows on the bank. Plath and Hughes' relationship soured amid his philandering, her depression and her jealousy over his early publishing success. But John Brownlow's screenplay leaves viewers to conclude that was all there was to the marriage. Their young daughter and son are barely present, their two years living in Plath's native Massachusetts is depicted in just a few scenes and her time in therapy while in America is ignored. Sylvia mostly settles for giving Paltrow showy moments to rail against Hughes or play the moody emotional martyr in introspective moments. We all know Plath killed herself. Sylvia provides the facts and external circumstances -- death by carbon-monoxide poisoning from her gas oven in February 1963, a month after her book The Bell Jar was published. The movie traces the contributing factors -- a bad marriage, artistic frustration, critical neglect of her work. Yet the root causes remain generally unexplored. The film never leaves any sense of her real inner world and what made her predisposed to suicide. In one scene, Plath's mother (played by Paltrow's real-life mom, Blythe Danner) recounts young Sylvia's early suicide attempt, when she took sleeping pills then hid in a cubbyhole beneath the house, where she was not found until three days later. Again, we're given the effect, not the cause. The filmmakers seem to think Plath is such a poster-poet for depression that it's enough simply to proclaim her as suicidal without exploring why. New Zealand-born director Jeffs struck a delicate chord with her promising debut feature Rain in 2001, a moody, perceptive study of a teenage girl's transition to adulthood amid troubled family times. Sylvia needed more of Rain's gossamer inward gaze and less of the let's-win-Gwyneth-another-Oscar histrionics.  

MEAN GIRLS: Not so good.  biting wit, then runs out of steam. Rating: 2 stars out of five. Mean Girls means to be an updated version of the best teen comedies of the 1980s, like Heathers and Sixteen Candles. While it definitely captures elements of those movies, and features a sparkling performance from rising star Lindsay Lohan, it never quite reaches the same level of instant cult classic. There's the darkly subversive humour and a terrifying trio of queen bees who buzz through the high school halls, like Heathers. There's the acutely observant depictions of various cliques and their labels, particularly in that minefield known as the cafeteria, that made audiences relate so well to Sixteen Candles. But when you look closely, there's another pop culture phenomenon that Mean Girls resembles even more: Saturday Night Live, which makes sense, since it springs from the mind of SNL head writer Tina Fey. The same things that are right and wrong with most of the late-night comedy show's skits are right and wrong with Mean Girls. It comes on strong with sharp, biting wit and great energy, then runs out of steam and doesn't know when to call it quits. (The presence of Tim Meadows, Amy Poehler and Ana Gasteyer also feels familiar in this Lorne Michaels Production, which mercifully lacks the idiotic humor that marked some of his other movies, including A Night at the Roxbury and The Ladies Man.) As directed by Mark Waters (who also directed Lohan in last year's charming remake of Freaky Friday), the movie's structure also feels like a series of sketches. Lohan's character - the new girl in school, Cady, who'd been raised in Africa by her zoologist parents - alternates between the outcasts who initially befriended her and the popular group, which she infiltrates. Each scene offers some great one-liners and a few memorable physical jokes, but there's little narrative momentum to tie the film together and drive it along. This is Fey's first screenplay, though, based on Rosalind Wiseman's best-selling nonfiction book Queen Bees & Wannabes: Helping Your Daughter Survive Cliques, Gossip, Boyfriends & Other Realities of Adolescence. (It's also Fey's first big film role: The dryly funny Weekend Update anchor plays a dryly funny math teacher and the movie's voice of reason.) And for a while, she has a good thing going. Cady arrives at a suburban Chicago high school (which has to be a nod to those great John Hughes movies like Sixteen Candles, The Breakfast Club and Ferris Bueller's Day Off, which also were set there) and becomes friends with punk rock girl Janis Ian (Lizzy Caplan) and chubby Damien (Daniel Franzese), who's "too gay to function."  One day during lunch, she ends up getting trapped in the web of The Plastics, as they're known. Fabulous, blond Regina (Canadian actor Rachel McAdams) is their cruel leader, and her minions are the insecure, sycophantic Gretchen (Lacey Chabert) and the airheaded Karen (Amanda Seyfried). When Cady lets it slip that she has a crush on Aaron (Jonathan Bennett), a cute guy in her calculus class who happens to be Regina's ex-boyfriend, Regina befriends her with the intention of destroying her. Janis and Damien have their own plans for destroying the Plastic pack, and figure Cady's access is the best way to achieve them. Cady is caught between both worlds but - because mean girls can be so intimidating and persuasive - she ends up becoming just like them. There are well-intentioned lessons to be learned here and in the book that serves as the movie's inspiration. Fey makes them entirely too facile and literal, banging us over the head a couple of different times with platitudes about the need for girls to be kind to themselves and each other. If she'd only had a lighter touch, the message would have been much more powerful.

GODSEND: A scary thriller but leave before the end. Rating: 2 stars out of five. Godsend is so creepy, so scary, so moody - then collapses in a series of laughable cliches in the final reel. This thriller about a couple (Greg Kinnear and Rebecca Romijn-Stamos) who replace their dead son with a clone keeps the chills coming in a series of spectacular nightmare sequences. Robert De Niro, meanwhile, lingers on the periphery as an avuncular fertility scientist who wants to monitor the success of his experiment. He's a friendly, neighborhood Dr. Frankenstein, pushing the limits of science because he can, heedless of the moral and spiritual consequences. In the middle is Adam (steely-eyed 11-year-old Cameron Bright) who does not know that a previous version of him existed and died in an accident years ago. When he ages past the day when his previous self died, Adam begins to have hallucinations and frightening dreams that baffle his parents. Here's where director Nick Hamm is at his best, constructing vertigo-inducing set pieces in which spooky reflections of Adam scream at him from windows and bizarre children surrounded by flames jump out at him from doorways. It's a combination of gothic visuals and startling sound effects, but it works and keeps the nerves tingling - for a strong ending that never arrives. What has caused Adam's night terrors and bloodthirsty impulses?

Does it have something to do with the soul outliving what God intended for the body? Or did modern medicine leave the soul out entirely when Adam was recreated? The answer put forth - in a desperate attempt at a "twist" shocker - fails to live up to the other possibilities. When a new character is introduced to tie together all the threads, it's as if the entire production flies off track and crashes. Kinnear and Romijn-Stamos are subtle and powerful throughout most of the movie, but seem more puzzled than shocked by the ending their characters find themselves in - as if they suspect they're being Punk'd. Even the normally dependable De Niro falters. At one point, he slides behind the wheel of his car and hammers his fists. "Why, why, why, why, why didn't he listen to me?!" he cries. It's a hairpin turn from a few moments earlier, when his character was menacing - and De Niro's half-hearted delivery evokes laughter from the audience. Bright is the film's only consistent presence, alternating between being the victim of terror and the perpetrator of terror. Godsend, written by Mark Bomback, had the potential to rank alongside The Sixth Sense in terms of authentic spookiness, and would have been a memorable thriller if Bomback, Hamm and the actors had taken a little more care with the third act. There remains a lot to praise about the first two-thirds of the movie, however. See Godsend with some friends - but leave the theatre 80 minutes into the movie and have a good time making up your own endings. You'll enjoy it a lot more. -Anthony Breznicann.

THE PUNISHER" has too much violence without substance. Rating: 1 star out of five. The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." The makers of The Punisher, Hollywood's latest comic-book adaptation, need a basic civics lesson. Even matinee-ticket prices for The Punisher conceivably constitute excessive fines, and the sadistic two-hour assault of the movie itself certainly qualifies as cruel and unusual treatment of audiences looking for a good time. Between Walking Tall and The Punisher, Hollywood has delivered a one-two punch of debased vengeance, where heroes are as bloodthirsty as villains and the two differ only infinitesimally in that the filmmakers have stuck a halo on one and horns on the other.

It's like the old editorial cartoon that used the same illustration of an armed thug for a Salvadoran guerrilla (a bad guy in the U.S. government's opinion) and a Nicaraguan freedom fighter (a good guy from a U.S. stance). Same person, same deadly violence, slightly different interpretation of motive. Based on the Marvel Comics character introduced in The Amazing Spider-Man in 1974, The Punisher tries to set up FBI undercover agent Frank Castle (Thomas Jane) as a noble family man so viewers will sympathize when he turns pitiless vigilante. Yet Castle's a cold fish from the start, hollowly expressing displeasure when his final undercover sting goes awry before he moves on to a peaceful life in the bureau's London office. The consequences are tragic for shady Tampa businessman Howard Saint (John Travolta), whose son is killed by the feds. Castle whines to his colleagues that no one was supposed to die, but in the leaden scenario co-written by director Jonathan Hensleigh, Castle clearly could not care less that someone else's pride and joy wound up on a slab. Egged on by his wife (Laura Harring), Saint gets payback with interest, killing Castle's wife, son, parents and dozens of other relatives at a family reunion. Castle himself is left for dead, but he recovers and returns as the Punisher, an avenging demon intent on making Saint and his loved ones suffer in spades. In the comics, Castle turned executioner of the wicked at large after losing his family in a random act of violence. In giving him a personal target, the filmmakers have turned Castle into the very thing he's hunting, a depraved killer out to spill as much blood as he can. Jane's inanimate performance doesn't help. His Castle only seems alive when he's butchering people; with his dead eyes and wooden dialogue, he's like a sleepwalker the rest of the time. The movie provokes unintentional laughs with its excessive violence and especially with its clumsy efforts to capture Castle shirtless as often as possible to show off Jane's chiselled torso. Travolta makes for a passable weasel of a heavy, and Will Patton has a moment or two as his faithful lieutenant, whom Castle sets up in a nasty ploy involving Saint's wife. Harring and the rest of the cast are generally just moving targets, including Samantha Mathis as Castle's wife and Roy Scheider as his dad. Rebecca Romijn-Stamos, Ben Foster and John Pinette are tossed in as kindly neighbors in a run-down tenement where Castle establishes his revenge headquarters. The three are there only to give Castle someone decent to fight for; otherwise, nothing on screen would differentiate him from the bad guys he's battling. The one loophole on the Eighth Amendment left by the filmmakers is on the "excessive bail" aspect. Thankfully, you can bail on this awful movie any time you like, and you should do it at the ticket counter by choosing another flick.

HELLBOY: Promising at the beginning, but gradually flaming out. Perlman is his own best comic relief. Rating: 2 stars out of four. Likewise, Hellboy begins as a refreshingly wry alternative among the flood of gloomy comic-book heroes Hollywood has tossed on the big screen. Despite Ron Perlman's merry, self-deprecating presence as the title demon, Hellboy gradually flames out amid the usual chaos of too-loud explosions and too-numerous computer-animated beasties. The movie ends up looking like a concoction of everything remotely demonic that has come before it, a hodgepodge of X-Men, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, The X-Files and Ghostbusters. Adapted from Mike Mignola's Dark Horse comics by writer-director Guillermo del Toro, Hellboy opens in the closing days of the Second World War as Hitler's occultist forces, aided by legendary lunatic Grigori Rasputin (Karel Roden), uncork a gateway from our world to hell to bring about Armageddon. An Allied strike force toasts Rasputin and company and closes the portal, but not before a bouncing baby demon with red skin, horns and a tail slips through. Intended as a harbinger of the world's end, Perlman's Hellboy instead is raised by kindly Professor Broom (John Hurt). With super strength, an arm of stone to batter down walls and invulnerability from fire, Hellboy becomes the mainstay of the U.S. government's Bureau for Paranormal Research and Defense, pummeling monsters and sending them packing back to hell. "There are things that go bump in the night," says Professor Broom. "And we are the ones who bump back." Sixty years after his previous attempt, Rasputin returns from beyond with a plot to bring Hellboy back into the fold and lay waste to Earth. Perlman has had a prolific career as a modern Lon Chaney playing creatures and disfigured figures, including the ugly half of TV's Beauty and the Beast. As Hellboy, he has a similar brute-babe relationship with the bureau's resident firebug, Liz Sherman (Selma Blair), a woman who can set things ablaze when angered. Hellboy's new FBI ally, John Myers (Rupert Evans), also ends up his rival for Liz's affection. Rounding out the cast are Jeffrey Tambor as an overbearing FBI honcho and Doug Jones as Hellboy's aquatic mutant sidekick Abe Sapien, both adding healthy doses of humor. Perlman is his own best comic relief, though, wisecracking through endless battles with hellhounds, chomping cigars, guzzling Red Bull and filing down his horns so he can fit in among polite company. Born a demon, Hellboy is a poster child for the nature-vs.-nurture debate, an example that even the badest seed can walk the path of virtue, albeit with some side trips into adolescent hijinks. Del Toro omits the usual dark-side brooding of the superhero tempted to use his powers for personal gain, instead presenting a crusader whose flaws are simply part of his character and who approaches his job with working-class resignation. Unfortunately, after setting up this fresh blue-collar scenario in the movie's first hour, Del Toro wallows in pyrotechnics.

_____________________________________________

VERONICA GUERIN. Rating : 3 stars. CATE BLANCHETT: A TROOPER RENEGADE.

Movies have always confused journalists with cops, and maybe the comparison isn't far off: Both jobs appear to be about unraveling mysteries, but both are really about paperwork. The difference, however, is that cops get shot more often. Not to belittle those journalists who put their lives on the line daily, but their movie brethren are a Hollywood fantasy of tough-talking, street-walking renegades without deadlines. Meet the patron saint of fantasy journalists: Veronica Guerin, real-life crime columnist for the Sunday Independent who was shot to death in 1996 for digging too deep into Dublin's drug trade. As played by Cate Blanchett, she's professionally relentless, meaning she'll wear black stilettos to get her story or storm into a room of junkies and announce, "I'm Veronica. Where did you get the gear?" Movie Guerin also never takes a single note or uses a tape recorder. When she's shot in the first few minutes -- the movie is one big flashback -- one wonders if the killers are revenge-seeking fact checkers. The hack coating that clings to this compelling story is courtesy of director Joel Schumacher. The man behind Bad Company and the two worst Batmans (yes, he made the respectable war pic Tigerland, but he'll have to give us several dozen Tigerlands to make up for Flawless) is a cinematic bully; his greatest pleasure is to get in his audience's face and roar, filling every possibly thoughtful moment with a loud noise. Schumacher is faithless; he doesn't believe moviegoers could care about Veronica Guerin unless those out to get her are cackling cartoon baddies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photo: 'HEAVEN' FORBIDDING Blanchett and Giovanni Ribisi cut to the chase.

The drug-addled city is in the palm of John Gilligan (Gerard McSorley), an explosive gangster with a fondness for horses. He's surrounded by grunting leather-jacketed thugs, each indistinguishable from the next. To get to Gilligan, Guerin uses her favorite source, John Traynor (Ciarán Hinds), a low-level hood with a hunger for publicity. Their relationship is the most interesting in the film: each parasitic, each slightly enamored with the other. Blanchett, who plays Guerin as an overly sparky plug, doesn't really connect with anyone the way she does this greasy guy with the bad dye job. Her husband is a shadowy chastiser who says almost nothing except "be careful." Which begs the question: How exactly is it different for a woman to play the hero? According to this film, it's no different; absent mother is just like absent father.  But several moments hint at a more interesting response, and a more interesting movie: When Guerin's little boy shows her a skateboard at his birthday party, she asks who gave it to him. "You and Dad," he says, and Mom looks guilty as hell. If Guerin's love for her family is so strong, why then does she shrug off police protection and run headfirst into danger? Because, of course, she's not really a journalist, she's a movie journalist, which means she's a cop. Except, of course, she was a real journalist, and therein lies the film's great offence: phoniness. Inadvertently (one hopes) Schumacher paints Guerin as irresponsible -- not just a martyr, but a selfish rogue who abandons her family. It's hard to imagine Daniel Pearl getting the same treatment in his crusading journalist biopic.

FILMS OF SUBSTANCE OF THE YEAR

Mystic River Rating :

Photo: Sean Penn in Mystic River.

Self-doubt, ethical compromise and moral ambiguity are on the cards when three childhood friends are reunited following the murder of one's daughter  Clint Eastwood's latest movie as a director is a stolid, masculine thriller bearing the lineaments of tragedy - something classical or even biblical. It's a film where work, good and bad, is done by men, with women getting to play the tremulous wives or daughters. Kevin Bacon, Sean Penn and Tim Robbins are childhood buddies from a blue-collar Boston neighborhood whose friendship is torn apart by a grisly crime that happened when they were boys. They grow up and drift apart to become respectively a cop, a reformed hoodlum, and a moodily difficult loner, but a new and even more horrible crime intertwines their destinies once again.-Peter Bradshaw.   This is a film with no small opinion of its own importance as an exposition of real men's emotional lives; its soundtrack strives for grandeur and there are plenty of giant, overhead shots of the principals and their hometown, as if from the gods' Olympian viewpoint. Its muscular conviction often commands assent, especially when it comes to Sean Penn's very strong performance and Kevin Bacon's no less impressive and characteristically un-showy contribution. Robbins' twitchy persona, all drooping shoulders and neurotic glances, is a little harder to take, though he has one outstanding scene in a police interrogation room. Eastwood's drama is substantial, but monolithic, like a handsome, well-made piece of traditional American furniture.

Eastwood brings a dark edge to Boston in a mature, complex thriller that ranks among his best.

Not many directors do their best work in their sixties and seventies. But Clint Eastwood, who has been a major and beneficent force as actor, director and producer for more than 30 years, has made few better films than the beautifully crafted Mystic River, directed in his seventy-third year. Several things set it apart from most of his other movies. The first is that the setting is working-class Boston. Something of an adversary of the East Coast establishment, Eastwood prefers the West and the South for his settings. I can think of only two previous pictures of his that are set in New York and New England, and both are about outsiders - the Arizona cop visiting Manhattan to pick up a fugitive criminal in Coogan's Bluff and Charlie Parker coming to New York from Kansas City in Bird. Another thing is that in the majority of his movies the antagonists have been raging psychopaths. But like the western Unforgiving, which brought him Oscars for best film and best direction in 1992, there are no born villains in Mystic River. Everyone is the creation of the community in which they were reared and the moral struggle their background engendered. The movie is adapted by Brian Helgeland (who wrote the screenplay for Eastwood's last picture, Blood Work) from a novel by Dennis Lehane, and it begins in the late 1970s when three Irish-American schoolboys, Jimmy Markum, Sean Devine and Dave Boyle, are playing street hockey near their houses. When their ball goes down a sewer they're distracted by a square of wet cement on the sidewalk, and the dynamic Jimmy suggests scratching their names in it. He's first off followed by Sean, but Dave has got only as far as the first two letters of his name when a police car pulls up and a plainclothes detective starts questioning them. He orders Dave to get into the car to be driven home for admonishment by his mother. But the cops are in fact sadistic pederasts. After four days in a cellar, Dave manages to escape from his abductors. The traumatic experience is as firmly etched on his mind and has become as ineradicable a part of Jimmy's and Sean's experience as those names preserved in concrete.

This subtle, brilliantly handled opening places the boys in their social context, and its deliberate pace sets the tone for a long, dark, detailed, involving movie. Without any announcements about the passage of time, the film leaps forward to the present with the boys now in their thirties. Dave (Tim Robbins) is a troubled man, taking casual jobs, being over-protective of his small son, and having an edgy relationship with his wife, Celeste (Marcia Gay Harden). Jimmy (Sean Penn) runs a small convenience store, has a 19-year-old daughter Katie by his first wife, and two other girls by his second (Laura Linney), one of whom is about to make her first communion. Sean (Kevin Bacon) has moved away from the boyhood neighborhood and is a successful homicide cop, though his obsession with his profession - as is so often the case in movies and so-called real life - has driven his pregnant wife to move to New York without leaving an address.

Then suddenly the trio are drawn together again when Katie is found brutally murdered in a local park. Sean is assigned to investigate the killing with his partner Whitey (Laurence Fishburne). Suspicion gradually falls on the disturbed, guilt-ridden Dave, because that night he sustained several wounds from a mugger, or so he tells his wife. The vengeful Jimmy, it transpires, has a criminal record - having gone to jail for armed robbery as a teenager - and he turns vigilante, calling on some former underworld associates to help him track down the murderer. The result is a cleverly plotted and convincing police procedural thriller. Within its margins, there's a delightful performance from Eli Wallach as the elderly owner of a liquor store. But the film is much more than that. It's a complex exploration of painful relationships between fathers and children, husbands and wives, brothers and sisters, and old friends. The unfashionably slow editing style and the concentration on close-ups and two-shots allow Eastwood to scrutinize his characters as they are forced to dig into themselves. The performances have a rare depth, intensity and rawness.   The movie recalls in some ways a 1996 film, Sleepers, in which a group of New York youngsters, abused at a reform school, reunite as adults to exact revenge on their tormentors. But that was a glib, lumbering work. Mystic River brings more closely to mind the Catholic, blue-collar, suburban Boston of corner-cutting cops, petty criminals, dubious lawyers and working-stiffs that George V. Higgins charted in some 20 thrillers, only one of which, The Friends of Eddie Coyle, has been filmed. The movie's title directs us to this darker world. The Charles River separates historical Boston from the intellectually lofty Cambridge, and the oarsmen from Harvard and MIT perform on its waters. But further north is the Mystic River, bordered by docks and wastelands, its name minatory, its waters black and threatening. One of the film's climactic scenes takes place at night along the Mystic River, beside an Irish bar that resembles the dockside headquarters of Johnny Friendly in On the Waterfront. It carries a tragic weight of feeling and experience that goes to the heart of this complex, compassionate film. Details: 2003, USA, Drama, cert 15, 137 minutes, Dir: Clint Eastwood . Cast: Kevin Bacon, Laurence Fishburne, Marcia Gay Harden, Sean Penn, Tim Robbins.

INTOLERABLE CRUELTY. Rating:  

It is traditional, when considering the films of the Coen brothers, to remark on their versatility, and their ability to pastiche and corrupt genres, while also remaining true to their chosen form. There is some truth in this notion, but, as a means of understanding their output, it is increasingly unhelpful. The Coens’ films - of which Joel is the listed director, and Ethan a screenwriter - are more easily seen as reflections of a cinematic imagination. They have an old-fashioned belief in the importance of character, and a playful interest in storytelling, and both qualities are rendered with an imagination informed by B-movies and pulp fiction. Their work is not just an academic trawl through genre: from thriller to police procedural to - ahem - bowling opera and depression-era Homeric chain gang comedy. This does not make them realists, and Intolerable Cruelty takes their work to a new level of whimsy. That it succeeds is largely due to the performance of George Clooney, a leading man who now has the confidence to mock the notion of leading men. Clooney is Miles Massey, a grinning lawyer who specializes in expensive divorces, but who is also in the midst of a mid-life crisis which he is reluctant to acknowledge. He defines life as "struggle and challenge and the destruction of your opponent" and considers marriage to be a concept in which obsolescence is inbuilt: "Time marches on. Ardor cools." He is also a workaholic. In his first scene , he is at the dentist, talking turkey through a rubber gum dam, and there are several scenes in which he checks the brilliance of his smile. Details: Directed by: Joel Coen. Starring: George Clooney; Catherine Zeta-Jones.

Clooney seems to be wearing prosthetic teeth for the part, which is a comic parody of Wall Street’s Gordon Gekko, and even includes a keynote speech spoofing Gekko’s "greed is good" mantra, in which Massey asserts that "love is good". (The speech is to the National Organization of Matrimonial Attorneys Nationwide, whose slogan is "let NOMAN put asunder".) There is, then, a degree of ironic pleasure to be taken from the fact that the love interest is supplied by Catherine Zeta-Jones, wife of Michael Douglas, who played Gekko. While Douglas gave a performance full of such oily intensity that it was hard to locate the irony, Clooney does something better, playing an insincere, unprincipled fool, who remains breezily likeable. On ER, Clooney didn’t act so much as mug intensely.

His repertoire was a smolder, a shrug, and a curious neck-crick to signal emotional discomfiture. Now, he has perfected the chemistry in which the swagger, the voice, and the Brylcreem combine to make a winning parody of a hero. He has a nice way of narrowing his eyes. He cleans his teeth squeakily with his finger. His timing is spot-on: see the scene where he encounters a breathless assassin, and asks: "Are you ... Wheezy Joe?" (The pause being filled by the assassin’s labored attempts to commune with his lungs). As the money-grubbing vamp, Marylin Rexroth, Zeta-Jones is a cosmetic success. Normally an offensive screen presence, she manages here to evince a dreamy flirtatiousness, without quite becoming a Dynasty villainess. She smolders well, which is enough, as smoldering is her main purpose. Another actor on the verge of self-parody, Billy Bob Thornton, does well as the idiot oilman, Howard D Doyle of Doyle Oil, who is tricked into marrying Marylin. Geoffrey Rush, as cuckolded TV producer Donovan Donaly, is less endearing, though there is a moment of satisfaction when he is attacked with his daytime television lifetime achievement award. The most subtle performance comes from Miles’s sidekick Wrigley (Paul Adelstein), while Jonathan Hadary is winningly overstated as Heinz, the Baron Kraus von Espy, a fop with a fluffy dog. At the start of their career, the Coens had trouble bringing warmth to their films. Intolerable Cruelty finds them at their most accessible, but, as a love story which celebrates divorce, it is not without its subtleties. It is also a film of great, inexplicable scenes - Clooney in a kilt; a psychotic waitress taking umbrage at an order for baby fried greens - and witty detail (note Clooney’s face as he peruses a copy of Living Without Intestines magazine). As befits a film in which one of the biggest laughs comes from a guitar-playing minister, off screen, singing the opening line of Simon and Garfunkel’s Punky’s Dilemma, the tone is more oddball than screwball, with the comedy coming from a place slightly to the right of left field. "Wish I was a Kellogg’s Cornflake," the minister sings, "Floatin’ in my bowl takin’ movies." He talks, I think, for the Coen brothers. He may even be sincere.

TIME OF THE WOLF

The central image of the 1921 film Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, its origins in the Bible and medieval iconography, put before the public a vision of a world on the brink of total destruction. Perhaps the first film to show our civilization reduced to ashes was Things to Come in 1936 which prophesied a Second World War resulting in total annihilation. Since Hiroshima, however, the post-apocalyptic movie has become a worldwide sci-fi genre, ranging in Australia alone from the pious solemnities of On the Beach to the comic-strip rumbustiousness of the Mad Max flicks. Directed by the gifted but earnest Austrian Michael Haneke, Time of the Wolf is art-house apocalypse, a somber, self-important picture that begins in media res and ends without reaching any climax or resolution. After some unexplained catastrophe that has led to a total social breakdown in an unidentified country, a middle-class family consisting of a strong-willed father, his wife Anne (Isabelle Huppert), a teenage daughter Eva and a 10-year-old son Ben, arrive by car at their country cottage to discover it occupied by an armed stranger, his wife and children.

After some tense talk about what provisions the visitors have, the father is suddenly killed by the intruder. After this shocking start, Anne and the children flee with a bike and the clothes they stand up in. Their desperate journey takes them through a silent, hostile village where all the farm animals have been killed, across a deserted  landscape, and they end up by attaching themselves to a small colony of fugitives living in a warehouse at a remote rural railway station.   The land is mist-enshrouded, there is no electricity to brighten the nocturnal gloom and life has been reduced to barter - exchanging watches, jewelry, cigarettes and sexual favors for potable water, a little food and additional clothing. Crackling news on transistor radios suggests that some sort of life is going on elsewhere and everyone's hopes center on the possibility of a passing train transporting them to a better place. Meanwhile, life limps on with every small act of generosity matched by one of callous exploitation or dishonesty. There are exciting moments such as the little boy Ben getting lost in the night and Anne and Eva searching for him, and a confrontation with the man who shot Anne's husband. But they are few, in a deliberately depressing film. What most engages Haneke, in dramatic terms, is the legend of the Just, a self-perpetuating sect of 36 people who since the beginning of time have been prepared to sacrifice themselves by self-immolation to preserve mankind. Details: 2003, France/Rest of the world, Drama, cert 15, 110 minutes, Dir: Michael Haneke. Cast: Anais Demoustier, Beatrice Dalle, Daniel Duval, Hakim Taleb, Isabelle Huppert, Lucas Biscombe, Patrice Chereau

THE LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN. Rating:

Wacky ideas don't get wackier than the one behind The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, originally a graphic novel co-written by Alan Moore, who brought us From Hell. This is a similar Victorian counter-factual adventure, or make that counter-fictional adventure. It's 1899; an evil kingpin called Fantom is stirring up trouble, so an A-Team of super good-guys muster to defeat him. Executive producer Sean Connery plays Allan Quatermain from Rider Haggard's King Solomon's Mines; there's Mina Harker from Bram Stoker's Dracula, Jules Verne's Captain Nemo, RL Stevenson's Dr Jekyll, Mark Twain's grown-up Tom Sawyer, Oscar Wilde's Dorian Gray and Rodney Skinner, a new "sequelised" character from HG Wells' The Invisible Man - the original presumably being the only one not yet quite out of copyright. Vampiress Mina is allowed to swoop around biting people, though apparently without turning them into vampires too; Mr Hyde is a bizarrely bulbous and non-scary Hulk, to distinguish him from the essentially similar Dorian Gray who is given the extra superpower of indestructibility. It's just so silly you have to like it. Sort of. But once the novelty wears off, you are left with a very over-egged pudding low on real thrills. Shekhar Kapur's dull Four Feathers and Simon Wells' ho-hum Time Machine shows that doing Victoriana straight is a stretch for Hollywood. But Alan Moore's funky pre-postmodern fantasies aren't working too well either.

BOLLYWOOD QUEEN. Rating:

A spirited attempt to make a British musical in the Bombay style, Bollywood Queen is a Romeo and Juliet story about a liberated Indian girl (the fetching Preeya Kalidas) having a love affair with a Somerset yokel (James McAvoy) in the rag-trade world around Brick Lane. There are good moments (notably the heroine escaping from a window using bolts of red, yellow and blue silk as a chute) and it's generally watchable. But rather than bending it like Beckham, Bollywood Queen puts the ball way over the crossbar. Details: 2002, UK, Drama/Comedy/Musical, cert PG, 89 minutes, Dir: Jeremy Wooding. Cast: Ciaran McMenamin, Ian McShane, James McAvoy, Preeya Kalidas

FRIDAY NIGHT (Vendredi Soir). A Film by Claire Denis.

Friday Night is a sensual and beguiling story of romance between strangers from master director Claire Denis (Chocolat, Beau Travail). It's Friday evening in Paris. Laure (Valérie Lemercier) has finished packing and shuts the door of her apartment behind her. The next morning, the moving men will be on the doorstep and she will move in with her boyfriend. She jumps in her car to go to dinner with friends, only to get stuck in a huge traffic jam, having forgotten that a mass transit strike has thrown the city into chaos. But Laure feels good in her car, the only place she has for herself right now. As she takes in the sights and sounds around her - the blare of horns and arguments, the shimmer of lights and camaraderie - a stranger (Vincent Lindon) approaches the car, calm and self-assured.

 

She jumps in her car to go to dinner with friends, only to get stuck in a huge traffic jam, having forgotten that a mass transit strike has thrown the city into chaos. But Laure feels good in her car, the only place she has for herself right now. As she takes in the sights and sounds around her - the blare of horns and arguments, the shimmer of lights and camaraderie - a stranger (Vincent Lindon) approaches the car, calm and self-assured.

 She opens the door to the man who that night will change her life. Exquisitely shot by Denis' longtime camerawoman Agnès Godard and with a lush score by Dickon Hinchliffe of the Tindersticks, Friday Night is a subtly erotic and lyrical ode to unexpected pleasures, to the independence of one's true self, and to the most beautiful city in the world. About Claire Denis: One of the world's most exciting and innovative directors, Claire Denis first won international acclaim in 1988 for her debut feature, Chocolat. She has since directed six other features (No Fear, No Die, Nenette Et Boni, I Can't Sleep, Beau Travail, Trouble Every Day, Friday Night) as well as a number of documentaries, short films and productions for French television. A filmmaker of great sensitivity and visual mastery, Claire Denis has been described by Jim Hoberman of the Village Voice as "intuitive and knowing, supremely tactile and deeply humanist, but what sets her apart from the current generation of American directors, both commercial and independent, is her interest not in making movie-movies but in committing the texture of life to film."

Trojan horseTROY

Film critics in the US and the UK have given mixed reviews about Wolfgang Petersen's latest movie Troy. Los Angeles Times: It should be said that Troy is only half silly. It is also half serious, not to mention half bloody and half talky, half well-acted and half walked through, half faithful to its venerable sources and half wildly invented. Yes, that's an awful lot of halves, but this is a movie that's nearly two and three-quarter hours in length. Washington Post: Just don't go into Troy expecting adherence to the subtler details of The Iliad. (This movie is to Homer's original what Charlton Heston's The Ten Commandments was to the Old Testament.) For starters, the gods are pretty much gone. No Zeus or Hera. No Aphrodite and the golden apple she offers to Paris. There's frequent mention of the sun god, whose temple Achilles desecrates at one point. But it doesn't seem to mean much that Achilles has sacked the place. There are no consequences. And there's no sense that the deeds of men are intertwined with the will of the Gods, possibly the most significant element of the original. The Guardian: The second story - or rather storey - is missing: that of the immortal Gods above, presiding capriciously over the humans' fates and disputing among themselves. Their presence is entirely excised, perhaps on the grounds that yet more snowy-haired Brit actors, wandering round up to their ankles in dry ice carrying thunderbolts, would undermine the sweaty, ardent seriousness of Brad, Orlando et al down below. But there is a case for cutting the humans and just making it their story:

The Passion of the Zeus, performed entirely in ancient Greek. Screen Daily: If, in the end, Troy fails to stir the heart as much as it dazzles the eye, it is nevertheless one of the most intelligent and ambitious tentpole blockbusters to come out of Hollywood in some time. After all, it took some guts and not a little hubris to take one of the cornerstones of literature, Homer's Iliad, and turn it into an audience-friendly summer movie. But powerhouse film-maker Wolfgang Petersen has never been intimidated by a challenge, and Troy impresses on more levels than it disappoints. Daily Telegraph: It's a disgrace. As an adaptation of The Iliad, it's a pathetic joke. But even on its own crude, blockbusting terms, Troy feels like a depressingly ordinary Lord of the Rings spin-off, peppered with uninvolving battle scenes and self-important intrigue. San Francisco Chronicle: The precedent for Pitt's Achilles is not to be found in Homer but in the Hollywood anti-heroes of the 1970s. Too cool to believe politicians, too cynical to fight for an ideal, he has no hope, just a fatalistic equanimity, and believes only in courage as a value in itself. When it comes to conveying smirky confidence, cocksure heroics and the in-the-moment intensity of a lover who knows who could be dead tomorrow, Pitt is magnetic. His performance falters only when he has to convey Achilles' rage, the mysterious and thinly veiled source of this warrior's effectiveness. Pitt just can't locate the anger, not convincingly. Hollywood Reporter: To remove the Gods from what is, after all, a Greek myth, is to gut your story. By playing down the divine, you lose the story's sense of fate, destiny and tragedy. Chicago Sun Times: Troy is based on the epic poem The Iliad by Homer, according to the credits. Homer's estate should sue. The movie sidesteps the existence of the Greek Gods, turns its heroes into action movie cliches and demonstrates that we're getting tired of computer-generated armies. Better a couple of hundred sweaty warriors than two masses of 50,000 men marching toward one another across a sea of special effects.

The return of swords and sandals epics

A scene from AlexanderIt may be all Greek to some, but the swords and sandals spectacular is making a comeback.

Photo: Eliot Cowan and Colin Farrell in a scene from Alexander.

This week sees the much-anticipated release of Troy in the US, a $185m (£103m) epic based on Homer's Iliad and starring Brad Pitt as Greek hero Achilles. It will be followed in January 2005 by Alexander, directed by Oliver Stone and starring Irish actor Colin Farrell as the Macedonian leader Alexander the Great. Next year the BBC will broadcast Rome, a 12-part mini-series set during the final years of Julius Caesar's reign. And few can have escaped the recent adverts for a certain fizzy drink showing Britney Spears and footballer David Beckham wreaking havoc in a Roman amphitheatre. Not since the days of Spartacus and Ben-Hur has this oft-derided genre been so much in favour.

David Beckham

Photo: David Beckham (left) adopts a gladiator pose in a recent advert.

Chariots and togas: Indeed, at one point there were no less than three Alexander projects in the pipeline - Stone's, another directed by Sir Ridley Scott, and a third from Moulin Rouge director Baz Luhrmann with Leonardo DiCaprio in the lead. The phenomenal success of Scott's 2000 Roman epic Gladiator has much to do with the current fascination with chariots, togas and swords. But this year's offerings form part of a wider resurgence of blockbuster films about mythical heroes from yesteryear. Arthurian legend makes a comeback in July with the release of King Arthur, which continues the classical theme. And Sir Ridley is currently in Spain shooting Kingdom of Heaven, another period adventure set during the time of the Crusades. The swords and sandals epic was born in the silent era, where it was nurtured by such legendary showmen as Cecil B DeMille and D W Griffith.

Casts of thousands: Griffith's Intolerance, partly set in ancient Babylon, the 1925 version of Ben-Hur and DeMille's original Ten Commandments set the mould for the genre: opulent sets, casts of thousands and thrilling action scenes that claimed the life of more than one stuntman. The formula made its first comeback in the 1950s, partly as a response to the new threat of television. Roman epics like Quo Vadis, The Robe and Spartacus used a combination of big stars and even bigger set-pieces to draw audiences back into cinemas.The 1959 version of Ben-Hur won a record 11 Oscars and saved the MGM studio from bankruptcy. But soon afterwards another studio - 20th Century Fox - was almost destroyed by the huge cost of making Cleopatra. The $44m production (the equivalent of $273m or £154m today) was a box-office disaster and effectively signalled the end of the big-budget Hollywood epic. The genre was further damaged by a string of cheap, poorly dubbed Italian knock-offs, usually starring former bodybuilder Steve Reeves. TV mini-series like I Claudius and Masada did much to salvage its credibility, and another bodybuilder turned actor - Arnold Schwarzenegger - enjoyed some success at the beginning of his career playing loincloth-clad warrior Conan the Barbarian. But it was Gladiator that brought the swords and sandals epic back into the public consciousness.

'Ancient worlds': Though the film cost over $100m, advances in computer technology negated the need for thousands of extras or built-to-scale sets. And the five Oscars it received in 2001 - including one for lead actor Russell Crowe - proved the genre could once more be taken seriously. According to Matt Mueller, editor of Total Film magazine, epic film-making is very much in vogue at present. "Hollywood realises it needs to get bigger and bigger to hold people's attention these days," he told BBC News Online. "As special effects become ever more sophisticated, you're able to recreate these ancient worlds at a relatively non-prohibitive cost." But Mr Mueller said cinemagoers should not expect this current craze to last for long. "Hollywood's always cyclical, so after a few years it will go on to something else," he said. "It remains to be seen if these films will live up to the hype."

SHATTERED GLASS. Rating: 4 Stars out of 5

Truth may be stranger than fiction, but fiction's often more entertaining. Could that be the motto of Stephen Glass, staff writer on American current affairs magazine The New Republic? In the 1990s, Glass was exposed as a conman who filed umpteen wild stories about teenage hackers and young Republican exploits without anyone rumbling that they were completely fabricated. In this nicely understated docu-drama, Hayden Christensen stars as the man who taught American journalism to read between the lies. Set in the middle of Bill Clinton's second term, when sex scandals dominated the headlines and the president infamously lied to the nation, Shattered Glass is as much about an era as a man. Getting a job at the snootiest current affairs magazine in the country - "the in-flight magazine of Air Force One" - Glass realises that the best way to succeed in 90s America is by re-inventing himself as a brilliant reporter. So what if the truth suffers? It's self-image that counts.Trashing his hunky Jedi Knight image, Hayden Christensen takes this bespectacled geek from zero to hero. Working with a script that deliberately avoids explaining Glass' motivation, Christensen pulls off quite a feat. He makes this weasley, sexless nerd more likeable than any of the other white-collar stiffs employed at The New Republic (played by Chloë Sevigny, Peter Saarsgard and Melanie Lynskey). Dull, boring and unable to file anything other than yawn-inducing policy reviews, they're desperate for some of the audacity of Glass' stories to rub off on them.

"ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN FOR THE CLINTON ERA"

Sketching the highbrow world of American political journalism with confident strokes, this real-life morality tale slowly builds into an All The President's Men for the Clinton era. In the 60s, investigative reporters Woodward and Bernstein brilliantly exposed President Nixon's lies. In the 90s, Stephen Glass followed the president's duplicitous example, reaping the benefits of a world more interested in image than truth.

AGAINST THE ROPES. Rating: 2 Stars out of 5

Meg Ryan doesn't deliver the knockout performance you'd hope for in Against The Ropes. Indeed her turn as feisty boxing manager Jackie Kallen is in keeping with a film that's fun for a while, but irredeemably lightweight. Making his big screen directorial debut, Charles S Dutton may be aiming for hard-hitting exposé, but he only scrapes the surface of this intriguing true-life tale. Boxing is in her blood, yet by her mid-30s Jackie Kallen finds herself in a corner, playing PA to Irving Abel (Joe Cortese), the director of the Cleveland Coliseum. The job affords her proximity to the action but she's undervalued, and endures daily insults. Egged on by friend and sportscaster Gavin Reese (Tim Daly), she finally makes a stand and exchanges verbal blows with bigwig boxing promoter Sam LaRocca (Tony Shalhoub). When she questions his professionalism, he laughingly offers her ownership of a contract for the princely sum of one dollar.The joke becomes clear when Kallen drops in on her new signing, Devon Greene (Tory Kittles), a hopeless crack addict. However fate steps in, assuming the muscular form of Luther Shaw, charismatically played by Omar Epps. He's a debt collector for local drug lords and makes Greene cough it up in blood. But you know where this is headed...

THE MOVIE LACKS ANY COMPLEXITY

It could be Jerry Maguire meets Erin Brockovich  meets Rahing Bull, except this movie lacks any complexity. Dutton opts instead to embellish the story with boxing clichés, best exemplified by his own role as the grizzled coach who comes out of retirement - oh, and his scruffy flat cap too.Any thread about female empowerment seems to correlate directly with the height of Kallen's skirt hem; more stuffed of bra than puffed with pride. Furthermore the racial divide separating Kallen and Luther, with all this implies for their relationship, is never explored. With so many gaps in the story, Against The Ropes hits wide of the mark.

BON VOYAGE. Rating: 4 stars out of 5

Originally titled The Road To Bordeaux, Jean-Paul Rappeneau's follow-up to Cyrano De Bergerac and The Horseman. Set during the Fall of France in June 1940, it's a rollicking adventure yarn with a stellar cast and an engaging Hitchcockian flavour. If there is a hint of 'Allo 'Allo in the rather farcical intrigue, it's a small price to pay for such a well-crafted and spirited caper. With Paris occupied by the Germans and the entire capital relocating to Bordeaux, it's clear that the problems of the little people don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world. For young writer Frédéric (Grégori Derangère), however, this pivotal stage in history takes a backseat to his devotion for pampered screen star Viviane (Isabelle Adjani, filling in for the pregnant Sophie Marceau). Only after he agrees to carry the can for the murder of her boyfriend does he realize that she's played him for a sap.

"OLD-FASHIONED MIX OF ESPIONAGE AND ROMANCE": Luckily for Frédéric, the authorities empty the jails before his life sentence can begin. Teaming up with conman Raoul (Yvan Attal) he sets off after Viviane, only to find her in the arms of a minister (Gérard Depardieu) who's in the process of establishing a collaborationist government. Throw in a Nazi spy (Peter Coyote), a pretty student (Virginie Ledoyen), and a vital supply of hard water, and you have an old-fashioned cocktail of espionage and romance that makes up for what it lacks in coherence with oodles of style. OK, it's a little hokey, with the nostalgic glow never quite masking problems with focus or a screenplay that doesn't know how to resolve its myriad subplots satisfactorily. If you share the director's passion for 40s melodrama, however, you're in for a treat. In French with English subtitles.

RADIO. Rating: 3 stars out of 5

Ed Harris makes Radio. Cuba Gooding Jr. has the showy title role of a mentally handicapped youth - so called because of his love for the wireless - but Harris provides heart and soul as the high school American Football coach who befriends him. Normally a stalwart supporting player, the crinkle-eyed character actor carries the movie, his still, sure presence providing emotional truth to a based-on-fact story that could have suffocated in schmaltz. Cynics should still skip it - and its racial politics seem too good to be true - but its innocence and charm make for warmly enjoyable entertainment.  Coach Jones (Harris) first spies James 'Radio' Kennedy (Gooding Jr.) watching football practice. And after star player Johnny Clay (Riley Smith) and his pals abuse the simple-minded loner, the teacher decides to compensate by involving him in their sporting set-up. "I'm not sure that he's not being used as some sort of glorified mascot," says the head mistress (Alfre Woodard) and she has a point: Radio does little more than goof off in front of the crowd and smile a lot. But his smile is infectious and even though Gooding Jr.  tries a little too hard to be winsome (it's a difficult role to pull of without seeming cutesy), it's credible that this tender outsider should enrich the lives of the supposedly 'normal' folks around him.

"IT'S HARD NOT TO GRIN": Obviously not everyone is happy with Radio's new role, but the objections of Johnny's smarmy father Frank (Chris Mulkey) are always rather muted - the film is too afraid of rupturing its cosy atmosphere to allow a really hissable villain. Towards the finale this proves a problem, as there is no great challenge for Coach and Radio to overcome: just the mild protestations of a group of puppyish concerned citizens. It seems unlikely that '70s South Carolina was so devoid of racism (perhaps this is another Hollywood whitewash to anger Spike Lee), but when the closing credits include footage of the real Radio and Jones, it's hard not to grin.

Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter... And Spring. Rating: 4 stars out of 5

Hitherto best-known amongst Asian cinema connoisseurs for such violent fare as The Isle and "Bad Guy",  Korean writer-director Kim Ki-Duk casts off his bad-boy reputation with magical fable Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter... And Spring. The film's dreamlike setting is a beautiful lake, surrounded by mountains and forests, and on whose waters floats a small wooden temple. Here live an elderly monk (Oh Young-Soo) and his mischievous child pupil (Seo Jae-Kyung). We follow the turbulent passage of the latter's life without moving away from this enclosed environment. Over the course of the film's five concise chapters, Spring, Summer... explores a whole range of human experiences: the pleasure and pain of desire, joy and sorrow, guilt and atonement, thoughtlessness and awareness, death and rebirth. Representatives of the outside world impinge on the lives of the central duo, with the arrival (in Summer) of a young woman seeking treatment for a mysterious illness causing the now teenage monk (Kim Young-Min) to fall passionately in love. "Lust awakens the desire to possess," his unnamed mentor warns prophetically, "which ends in the intent to murder." Animals serve as a recurrent motif within the individual sections, from the frogs and snakes around whose bodies the kid maliciously ties stones, to the cat whose tail is used to paint the calligraphic sutra, an action designed to cleanse a person's anger. And there are plenty of other imaginative touches, such as the stand-alone and often flooded door that serves as an unusual entrance to the lake.

"KI-DUK IMPRESSIVELY FUSES STYLE AND CONTENT": Ki-Duk, who himself takes on a key role in the Winter segment, impressively fuses style and content. He doesn't judge the actions of his characters or rely on Buddhist sermonizing to convey the film's ideas. Instead he achieves a sense of serenity through ravishing images of nature, contemplative pacing and the elegance of his storytelling, without losing sight of the burdens of our existence. In Korean with English subtitles.

The Football Factory. Rating: 2 stars out of five

Once the scourge of the terraces, football hooliganism is making a comeback - at the cinema. In 2005 we'll see Elijah Wood as a West Ham yob in The Yank, but first we have The Football Factory, a grim and earthy look at soccer's underbelly based on John King's cult 1996 novel. Danny Dyer plays a young hoodlum who has dedicated his life to "thieving, f***ing and fighting". And that just about sums up Nick Love's forceful but ultimately self-defeating wallow in the worst excesses of male working-class culture. Set in an urban wasteland of grotty pubs, rundown housing estates and building sites, Love's shoestring-budgeted movie is as far removed from the glamour of Premiership football as it is possible to imagine. Indeed, besides a few TV snippets and an FA Cup draw, the "beautiful game" is nowhere to be seen in his episodic and profanity-strewn drama.

"OBSCENE VIOLENCE, GRUESOME SENTIMENTALITY": Narrated train spotting-style by Dyer's cocky twentysomething Tommy Johnson, The Football Factory instead focuses on the fierce tribal loyalties which set Frank Harper's west London crew on a collision course with a rival mob from Millwall. For Tommy, life is a non-stop orgy of lager, drugs and brutality, with no room for work, family or relationships. Until, that is, a series of harrowing nightmares make him wonder if he's got what it takes to be part of "The Firm". Love expertly captures the self-doubt and insecurity that lies beneath his characters' swaggering bravado, while the fight scenes have a visceral intensity that reeks of authenticity. The writer-director should also be commended for assembling such a persuasive ensemble of mean-looking, shaven-headed gorillas. Alas, no amount of style or veracity can excuse the obscene glamorizing of senseless violence, while the avuncular presence of Tommy's grandfather (Dudley Sutton) introduces a gruesome streak of sentimentality that's just as unpalatable.

GIRL YEARNS FOR ADULTHOOD AND GETS IT

13 Going On 30. Rating: Four Stars                                                  

Jennifer Garner goes big in her first starring role in a comedy, and it pays off big-time, in 13 Going On 30. The star of TV's Alias plays an awkward 13-year-old girl who yearns for adulthood and is transported to her future as a 30-year-old woman, so comparisons to Big are inevitable. (And there are more than a couple of nods to that 1988 movie: She marvels at Manhattan through the sun roof of a limousine and makes simplistic suggestions at the office that are interpreted as genius.) That's OK, though, because Garner accomplishes something that Tom Hanks did, too: She truly makes you believe you're watching a child trapped inside the body of an adult, and is absolutely charming in the process. It's a joy to see Garner's radiant smile replacing her usual tough-gal scowl, to watch her use her physicality for having fun instead of kicking butt. Even during a potentially cringe-worthy moment at a party, when she busts out the moves from Michael Jackson's Thriller video and everyone else joins in, Garner is so lovably goofy, she makes it palatable. As Jenna Rink, she wishes during her 13th birthday party that she could be "30, flirty and thriving," to quote the fashion magazine that's her bible. That was back in the big-haired days of 1987, which brings me to a truly nitpicky quibble: The music, which is a huge part of the movie, is just a little bit off. Jenna listens obsessively to Jessie's Girl by Rick Springfield, which came out in 1981, and Madonna's Crazy for You, a hit in 1984, plays during a game of Seven Minutes in Heaven.

The aforementioned Thriller was big in 1983. Anyway, Jenna suddenly wakes up in a Greenwich Village apartment (with a fabulously stocked closet) and finds she's dating a New York Rangers hockey team star and has a high-powered gig at the same fashion magazine she read as a child. The logic in the script from husband-and-wife Josh Goldsmith and Cathy Yuspa, who also wrote What Women Want, gets shaky here. At times, Jenna seems to have the mentality of a young girl: She gets giggly and grossed out by the idea of making out with her boyfriend, for example. But at other times, she functions capably as an adult: Jenna commandeers a redesign of the magazine and competes with Lucy (Judy Greer), the meanest girl in school who, she's now surprised to learn, has become her best friend and co-worker. Gary Winick, who previously directed the low-budget Tadpole and produced indie films on digital video including Tape and Chelsea Walls, also goes big here, depicting Jenna's adventures with bright colour and high energy. But this teen-girl fantasy has some poignant moments, too, especially with Mark Ruffalo, who plays a grown-up version of the geeky boy next door she jilted as a child. Ruffalo, the co-star of You Can Count on Me who's great in everything he's in, even the self-serious In the Cut, gives the movie some emotional weight and resonance when everyone else is flitting about being girlie. 13 Going On 30 opts for the obviously happy ending when there are at least a couple others that would convey the film's message. But now I'm probably just being too grown-up and uptight. 

LORD OF THE RINGS

The Return of the King

It is finished. It is all over. The mighty conflict is at an end. And we, the dazed and shellshocked audience for Peter Jackson's colossal fantasy über-epic are permitted to disperse, as across the battlefield at sunset, picking our way through the horse-cadavers, twitching orcs and fallen warriors. No flabbier has been left ungasted by Mr Jackson's mighty battle sequences, nor no gob unsmacked. After three hours and 21 minutes of devastatingly sustained assault, underpinned by an almost continuous horn-blaring, kettle-drum-bothering orchestral soundtrack, we've got our hands up. It's been a long, long final installment, and never boring - although sometimes you feel the way prog rock fans must have felt on listening to the final side of Yessongs, glancing over at the needle tracking through the vinyl and realizing it's not over yet, not by a long way. Was it really only two years ago that Peter Jackson's The Lord of the Rings started? This giant movie marathon has dominated everyone's attention and its reputation has grown while other event-movie franchises have floundered. In Jackson, the Tolkien legend found the perfectly sympathetic director to realise its Arthuro-Nordic saga, and in Lord of the Rings, the computer-generated image technology found the perfect medium for the stunning new effects now possible. Technically it really is superb, with breathtaking landscape tableaux and settings, seamlessly meshing cyber-geography with the New Zealand locations. It is another triumph for production designer Grant Major and cinematographer Andrew Lesnie. But does it deserve those excitable claims of greatness? A moral exposition of good versus evil? After The Two Towers, I heard normally sensible critics jabbering the word "Miltonic". But imagine if Milton had decided to cut Satan out of Paradise Lost. Because Jackson has cut Saruman out of Return of the King: the evil lord so brilliantly conveyed by Christopher Lee. I don't know how that plays with the Tolkie purists, but I'm disappointed. Lee was one of only two really good acting performances in the series, among all the simpering maidens and beefcakes and callow hobbits, the other being Ian McKellen's splendid Gandalf. Saruman gone! Could it be that Peter Jackson decided that what with all the expensive battle scenes, there wasn't time? He could have cut half the shots of Elijah Wood's Frodo doing his bug-eyed, smudgy-faced worried expression, and freed up about 20 minutes. But there we are. Without Saruman, it's not good versus evil. It's good versus... a sort of swarming amorphous danger.

Hours after watching the film, I can close my eyes and see those incredible battle scenes pulsing and throbbing in my skull. They are even more extravagant than his jaw-dropping siege of Helm's Deep in The Two Towers. They have giant elephants and swooping pterodactyls. After the second movie, I compared his epic military set-pieces to Kurosawa, but it's a condescension he no longer deserves. His battles are a thing of wonder on their own account. Maybe Kurosawa's battles will one day be described as proto-Jacksonian. And for the first time in this series they are built on to a plot with some narrative force. The two feisty young hobbits Frodo (Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin) journey to Mordor in the company of the wicked and duplicitous Gollum (Andy Serkis) to destroy the Ring. Meanwhile, the forces of good led by Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen) embark on a massive diversionary tactic: an all-out assault on the orcs, to distract the evil one from seeing that Frodo is going to dispose of the Ring he covets. And there are loads of other show stopping moments, including a creepy tangle with a spider. It's a fantastic spectacle, but how much you really love it will depend on testicle-altitude. Unlike other fantasy stories which have an airy sense of buoyancy, The Lord of the Rings always has that stolid, puddingy heaviness, the earnestly childlike quality of which almost, but not quite, prevents it from being pompous. After every long-bearded, pointy-eared thing has been said and done, after every hobbity madrigal has been crooned, every unfunny pipe-smoking bit of business complete and every Elvish phrase solemnly intoned - subtitled, not dubbed - has this film anything meaningful to say about war, or about the eternal moral contest with evil? Well, with Saruman's omission there is no compelling intelligence directing the forces of darkness; the face of evil effectively has to be Gollum who, although nasty, is no worthy dramatic counterpoint for Aragorn and Gandalf. And anyway, in Return of the King, apart from the sacrificial loss of Bernard Hill's King Theoden, who is poignantly old anyway, the only people killed in battle are trillions and trillions of nameless beasties and anonymous hordes. No one important. Very different from warfare in the non-toytown world. There is no sobering experience of loss, no real sense of the obscenity and tragedy of war and therefore nothing really at stake. That's why it appeals to adolescent boys, and to adults sentimentally loyal to their departed, adolescent selves. It may seem churlish to remember how shallow The Lord of the Rings is, when the Peter Jackson movies have turned out to be such terrifically enjoyable escapism. I started the series an atheist and finished an agnostic. With enormous energy and a passionately exacting eye for detail, Jackson has made the regressive-romantic legend live again. He has given the Tolkien myth a turbo-charged rush into the 21st century. It's tripe. But he's made it mind-blowing tripe.

PART TWO

THE BOX OFFICE TOP FILMS

S.W.A.T. takes custody of box office. Cop comedy debuts with $37M

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at North American theatres, according to Exhibitor Relations Co. Inc. Final figures will be released Monday. 1. S.W.A.T., $37 million. 2. Freaky Friday, $22.3 million. 3. American Wedding, $15.1 million. 4. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl, $13.1 million. 5. Seabiscuit, $11.9 million. 6. Spy Kids 3-D: Gave Over, $10.1 million. 7. Bad Boys II, $6 million. 8. Lara Croft: Tomb Raider -- The Cradle of Life, $5.2 million. 9. Finding Nemo, $2.5 million. 10. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, $1.6 million. Calling in the SWAT team proved good business for Hollywood. Samuel Jackson and Colin Farrell's S.W.A.T., adapted from the 1970s TV cop show, slapped the cuffs on enough movie-goers to debut as the weekend's top movie with $37 million US, according to studio estimates Sunday. Another movie with 1970s roots, a remake of the mother-daughter comedy Freaky Friday, opened in second place with $22.3 million, pushing its total since opening Wednesday to $33.2 million. The film stars Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan as a squabbling mom and teenage daughter who magically switch bodies. "What's old is new again, I guess," said Paul Dergarabedian, president of box office tracker Exhibitor Relations. "The '70s had a really bad rap for a while . . . But stuff always comes back." Last weekend's top movie, American Wedding, slipped to third place with $15.1 million, bringing its 10-day total to $64.9 million. S.W.A.T. stars Jackson as a veteran special weapons and tactics leader in Los Angeles, who trains a new police team that includes Farrell, LL Cool J and Michelle Rodriguez.

The movie revolves around the SWAT team's mission to prevent the escape of a crime kingpin, who has offered a $100 million reward to anyone able to spring him from custody. Jackson, along with the nostalgia factor for those who recall the TV show, helped S.W.A.T. draw solidly among older crowds, with 45 per cent of the audience older than 25. "The movie's fun and fresh and has a hot cast," said Rory Bruer, head of distribution for Sony, which released S.W.A.T. "It's the sort of cast that's really kind of accessible to everyone." Freaky Friday updates the 1976 comedy that starred Jodie Foster and Barbara Harris. While audiences initially may have viewed Freaky Friday as a campy remake, solid reviews and a successful round of sneak-peek early screenings helped build solid buzz on the movie. "Whatever the attitude going in, people coming out of this movie are absolutely loving it," said Chuck Viane, head of distribution for Disney, which released Freaky Friday. Kate Hudson and Naomi Watts' romantic comedy Le Divorce opened strongly in limited release, taking in $533,000 in 34 theatres. From the filmmaking team of director James Ivory and producer Ismail Merchant, Le Divorce follows the romantic misadventures of two American sisters in Paris. Le Divorce expands to wide release over the next few weekends. The surfing documentary Step Into Liquid also opened well, taking in $135,000 at just five theatres in New York City, Los Angeles and Honolulu. The movie will be playing in the top 25 to 30 domestic markets by Aug. 22. CAST : Samuel L. Jackson: Dan "Hondo" Harrelson. Colin Farrell: Jim Street. Michelle Rodriguez: Chris Sanchez. LL Cool J: Deacon "Deke" Kaye .Brian Van Holt: Michael Boxer.  Jeremy Renner : Brian Gamble. DIRECTOR:  Clark Johnson. RELEASE DATE: Fri. Aug. 8, 2003. RELEASE: WIDE. GENRE:  Action, Suspense. LANGUAGE:  English

FREAKY FRIDAY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tess Coleman (Curtis) and her daughter Anna (Lohan) are not getting along. They don't see eye to eye on anything. One Thursday night, their disagreements reach a fever pitch- and on Friday morning, they wake up in each other's body. As they literally walk a mile in the other's shoes, they gain a little respect for the other's point of view. But with Tess's wedding coming on Saturday, they have to find a way to switch back - and fast! CAST:  Jamie Lee Curtis : Dr. Tess Coleman. Lindsay Lohan : Anna Coleman. Harold Gould : Grandpa. Stephen Tobolowsky : Mr. Bates. Chad Michael Murray : Jake. Mark Harmon : Ryan. DIRECTOR:  Mark Waters. RELEASE DATE: Wed. Aug. 6, 2003. RELEASE: WIDE. GENRE:  Family, Comedy, Drama. LANGUAGE:  English. DISTRIBUTOR:  Walt Disney Pictures

THE PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN

Jack Sparrow (Depp) has his ship stolen by his nemesis Barbossa (Rush). Jack also finds that Will Turner's (Bloom) friend Elizabeth (Knightley) has been taken captive by Barbossa because of an amulet she wears. Barbossa and his crew are cursed- and the curse can only be lifted when all of their plundered treasure is returned- and the amulet is key to breaking the curse. Together, Jack and Will travel to save Elizabeth and recover the ship. 

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

 

 

 

 

 

A team of extraordinary figures culled from great adventure literature (including Alan Quatermain, vampiress Mina Harker from Dracula, an Invisible Man, Dr. Jekyll / Mr. Hyde, an American secret service agent named Sawyer, Captain Nemo and Dorian Gray), are called to stop a villain intent on turning the nations of the world against one another.

TERMINATOR 3: The Rise of the Machines

1 hour, 40 minutes . Now 25, Connor (NICK STAHL) lives with no record of his existence- no way he can be traced by Skynet out of the shadows of the future steps the T-X (KRISTANNA LOKEN), Skynet's most sophisticated cyborg killing machine yet. Now Connor's only hope for survival is the Terminator (ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER), his mysterious former assassin. Together, they must triumph over the technologically superior T-X and forestall the looming threat of Judgment Day.

LEGALLY BLONDE 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour, 40 minutes. Now a rising young lawyer, Elle (Witherspoon) is about to make partner at her firm, she and Emmett (Wilson) are still in love, and her hair is still super healthy. But when she finds out her beloved Bruiser's canine relatives are being used as cosmetic test subjects, Elle heads to D.C. to accessorize her rights and take matters into her own well-manicured hands.

FINDING NEMO

Nemo (Gould) is a clownfish who has been taken away from his coral reef home. His father Marlin (Brooks) must travel through underwater worlds filled with danger to rescue him. On the way, Dory (DeGeneres), a fish with no short term memory, helps Marlin on his quest.

CHARLIE'S ANGELS: Full Throttle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour, 40 minutes. The Angels (Liu, Barrymore, Diaz) are ready to go undercover to retrieve 2 missing silver wedding bands containing valuable encrypted information- the new identites of every person in the Federal Witness Protection Program. When witnesses start to turn up dead, only the Angels can stop the perpetrator using their expertise as masters of disguise, espionage, and martial arts.

SINBAD: Legend of the Seven Seas

1 hour, 40 minutes. Sinbad (Brad Pitt) is the most daring and notorious rogue to ever sail the seven seas. Marina (Catherine Zeta-Jones) joins Sinbad on this, his greatest adventure. Together, they must battle Eris (Michelle Pfeiffer), the powerful goddess of Chaos, to save the fabled Book of Peace and the life of Sinbad's best friend- and most dangerous rival- Proteus (Joseph Fiennes).

28 DAYS LATER

1 hour, 52 minutes. A virus accidentally released from a research facility has devastated the entire planet. The human race is faced with extinction. A handful of survivors are left to salvage a future from the apocalypse.

THE HULK

1 hour, 40 minutes. Eric Bana (Black Hawk Down) stars as scientist Bruce Banner, whose inner demons transform him in the aftermath of a catastrophic experiment. Jennifer Connelly portrays Betty Ross, whose scientific genius unwittingly helps unleash The Hulk; Nick Nolte plays Banner' brilliant father, who passes on a tragic legacy to his son; and Sam Elliott portrays the commander of a top-secret military research center.

THE ITALIAN JOB

1 hour, 51 minutes. Mastermind thief Charlie Croker (Mark Wahlberg) pulls off an amazing gold bullion heist from a heavily guarded palazzo in Venice Italy, only to be doublecrossed by one of his crew. Seeking revenge, Charlie recruits Stella (Charlize Theron), a beautiful nerves-of-steel safe cracker, and along with his former gang, follows the backstabber to California where they plan to re-steal the gold by manipulating traffic lights and creating havoc on the streets of Los Angeles.

BOX OFFICE TOP RECORDS

1. Shrek 2, DreamWorks, $108,037,878, 4,163 locations, $25,952 average, $128,983,060, one week. 2. Troy, Warner Bros., $23,925,330, 3,411 locations, $7,014 average, $85,960,779, two weeks. 3. Van Helsing, Universal, $10,561,655, 3,418 locations, $3,090 average, $100,526,335, three weeks. 4. Mean Girls, Paramount, $6,907,627, 3,054 locations, $2,262 average, $64,706,896, four weeks. 5. Man On Fire, Fox, $3,680,522, 2,104 locations, $1,749 average, $69,461,524, five weeks. 6. Breakin' All the Rules, Screen Gems, $2,845,368, 1,318 locations, $2,159 average, $9,053,501, two weeks. 7. 13 Going On 30, Sony, $2,512,234, 2,028 locations, $1,239 average, $52,080,216, five weeks. 8. New York Minute, Warner Bros., $1,302,152, 2,360 locations, $552 average, $12,622,044, three weeks. 9. Kill Bill Vol. 2, Miramax, $1,078,811, 854 locations, $1,263 average, $62,711,658, six weeks. 10. Super Size Me, Roadside, $973,644, 148 locations, $6,579 average, $2,941,708, three weeks. 11. Laws of Attraction, New Line, $924,734, 1,010 locations, $916 average, $16,849,742, four weeks. 12. Envy, DreamWorks, $604,606, 521 locations, $1,160 average, $12,181,484, four weeks. 13. A Day Without a Mexican, Telvisa Cine, $554,434, 103 locations, $5,383 average, $1,400,441, one week. 14. Walking Tall, MGM, $459,111, 689 locations, $666 average, $45,138,529, eight weeks. 15. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Focus Features, $342,428, 231 locations, $1,482 average, $32,944,436, 10 weeks. 16. Nascar: The Imax Experience, Warner Bros., $338,406, 72 locations, $4,700 average, $11,602,237, 11 weeks. 17. Godsend, Lions Gate, $316,135, 419 locations, $754 average, $13,994,861, four weeks. 18. Johnson Family Vacation, Fox Searchlight, $303,175, 394 locations, $769 average, $30,056,567, seven weeks. 19. The Passion of the Christ, Newmarket, $271,424, 715 locations, $380 average, $369,336,919, 13 weeks. 20. 50 First Dates, Sony, $231,731, 237 locations, $978 average, $119,861,977, 15 weeks.

 

Let the X help you stay on beat by schooling you on the proper way to pick a student loan lender.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continues on Next Page

Front Page I  Political & Social Analyses I Breaking News: USA, World, Europe, Middle East I PoliticsLast Minute International News I Issues of the Hour I Entertainment Cinema I World of Cinema & Entertainment this Year I Music: CDs I World of Music this Year I ArtsTelevision I People I People with an Attitude I Society Lifestyle Culture I Books Travel I Commentaries I Articles Gossips Personal HistoryNewsmakers Consumers I Work I Business Family I Parenting I Health I Around the world I Woman's world I Beauty I Fashion I Style I The Grapevine I Opinions I Viewpoints I Stars. Celebrities I Spotlight I Unusual & Strange World I Studies: Islam I History. Civilization: Iraq I Societies. Social Systems I In-Depth Articles I Contact I Liens inclus I Liens de valeur I